Talk:Charlie and Lola

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
???
TV This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
Mast at Alexandra Palace
This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. (Add assessment comments)
Low This article has been rated as low-importance within the BBC WikiProject.

  • We really need and artical on the cast like masie cowell or whatever her name is i want to know about them what they look like please help me start it it would be sooooo cute to put a picture to a voice i love doing that anyway keep wikipediaing xxx xxx xxx

The Charlie and Lola Books are sooo cute. They are now a TV show They have many collectables items from scrapbooks to party supplies to umbrellas!

I love these books too!

"You can also buy season one as a box set, or individually titled one, two, three and four. " Hardly encyclopaedic style. 129.206.90.2 15:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Then fix it.--CyberGhostface 19:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Episode Titles

What format is best used for the episode titles? Obviously, the typeface on the episode introductions isn't any help! Should we use caps on the first word and any proper nouns only or the current way, which can look only slightly just a bit awkward? HybridRed (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CBeebies Scheduling

Although the third series is currently airing in the UK on Fridays at 6:15pm, the 14 day EPG I have access to has shown that the schedule does indeed change as at least one episode - It is very special and extremely ancient - was taken off and an episode from a previous series put in it's place. HybridRed (talk) 10:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] is it over

is the show canceled —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.169.199.181 (talk) 00:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC).

why? where did you hear this?

It's not cancelled; it's most likely just a rumor going around. Season three is currently in the works. --75.52.92.177 05:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

i wish it was longer

Season Three is airing in the UK now.82.153.173.168 (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Charlieandlolatomato.PNG

Image:Charlieandlolatomato.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:06, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Charlielolacartoon.jpg

Image:Charlielolacartoon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] is this true?

a freind of mne told me that there was a computer series where it showed really violent stuff about charlie and lola where lola was killed alot and im just wondering is this true? 63.166.254.137 03:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

You seriously believed that? Trust me, the last thing that is is true. --Sharpay Evans 20:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

If it is true, its some sick fan-created thing and not an official game.--CyberGhostface 20:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

it wasnt a game it was a show i guess it was a parody63.166.254.137 00:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

It didn't exist. Your friend lied and you believed it... --Sharpay Evans 09:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Charlieandlolatomato.PNG

Image:Charlieandlolatomato.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Charlielola.JPG

Image:Charlielola.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Charlielolacartoon.jpg

Image:Charlielolacartoon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Lessons

I would suggest eliminating this column--for one thing, the interpretation required to deduce the lesson makes this Original Research; for another, it makes the show sound much more didactic than it actually is. Nareek (talk) 13:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)