Talk:Charlie McDonnell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I was told that multiple refs showing the subject's notability is enough. See the two refs. Buc 21:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- Have a look at WP:Bio - to be honest, just because they've been noted in two different places doesn't automatically make them notable, but it's probably borderline in this instance. I'm left thinking "so what" after reading the article, which is a pretty good indication (to me, anyway), that WP:NN isn't being satisfied. Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 21:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
how about if I provide more links [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bole2 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Written by fangirls
I know 'charlieissocoollike' from YouTube, and I enjoy his videos, but is this article necessary? It's a complete mess, it's full of original research, and it's like it's been written by fangirls. Either it be cleaned up, or it should be considered for deletion. 92.10.19.59 (talk) 20:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC)