Talk:Charles Scott (governor of Kentucky)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Charles Scott (governor of Kentucky) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on August 28, 2007.
October 4, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
Charles Scott (governor of Kentucky) is within the scope of WikiProject Kentucky, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Kentucky and related subjects in the Wikipedia.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the Project's importance scale.
Please explain ratings on the ratings summary page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Politics and government work group.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] date of birth

His date of birth differs from the one at Find-A-Grave. Lincher 14:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I have changed the birth date to 1739. Findagrave says 1739, the Kentucky Encyclopedia says 1739 (probably April), and the Kentucky Department of Libraries says April 1739. Lamont A Cranston 18:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 4, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: article is clear and concise and free of grammatical and spelling errors
2. Factually accurate?: article is well-sourced and all statements that require references have them
3. Broad in coverage?: article is complete
4. Neutral point of view?: no POV problems
5. Article stability? article is stable
6. Images?: images are free

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. — Argos'Dad 03:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)