Talk:Charles Schwab Corp.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So, identifying the so-called 'Human Rights Campaign' as a gay and lesbian movement group, as it is catagorized on the wikipedia entry for that entity, is considered 'vandalism'? I don't get it. When inserting information on "diversity", it should be important to understand the slant of the group giving a "%100 rating".
[edit] horrendous article top to bottom
needs a complete rewrite. so ugly.
I believe that the word "diversity" here is in reference to the types of funds that are available to the public at large (the word "diversity" has a very specific meaning in the world of investments, which is what this article is about)...NOT the term as it is in reference to how you are both interpreting it, that being as an employer who has a liberal mindset when it comes to GLBTQ issues.
Ardicius Greenknight 21:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] could the writing be any more confusing?
"It was good move but it turned out to be a mistake…" Critic9328 (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Charles Schwab logo.png
Image:Charles Schwab logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
