Talk:Charles Rust-Tierney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Biography Portal
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template.
  • If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page.
  • If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.
Pornography Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Pornography, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Lots to fix. Have at it. OBDM 01:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

I don't think it would violate any rules to mention the fact that numerous news sites completely failed to publish this story, it was about as much proof of a coverup and conspiracy as it gets. It seems only Right leaning news sources such as Fox and ABC even bothered to present the story, and CNN, NBC, and others seemed to have more important things to talk about, since it involved the left's best friend, the ACLU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.83.69.188 (talk • contribs) 08:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

It involves the former president of a state chapter of the ACLU. That's not the most newsworthy thing in the world. And since when is ABC a right leaning news source? Harksaw 13:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:03, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bill O'Reilly

Is the Bill O'Reilly portion of this article really necessary? While we're at it, why not post come of Hitler's commentary from Mein Kampf on the "Jews" article.

This guy is a FUCKING PEDOPHILE and you're worried about Bill O'Reilly's comments? Are you liberal? Nahh that couldn't be possible </sarcasm> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.176.115.77 (talk) 08:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I think the Bill O'Reilly section should be removed. If the section about media bias stays it needs to be clarified that the Washington Post is not a liberal newspaper, the entire executive staff are conservatives and it has been called a NeoCon publication more here: Washington Post's Political leanings -Mrbusta 20:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
I'm inclined to agree that the O'Reilly portion is irrelevent. If somebody out there MUST cover this, then it needs to be expanded considerably. I have removed it. With respect to the user who is worried about this subject, I would argue that it is YOU who are worried about O'Reilly's comments. The article is about a pedophile for certain, not media bias.Tony Reed (talk) 00:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)