Talk:Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Baronetcies.

I don't think the current page title is how he's best known at all, but he's one of those peers who has spread confusion over how he is best and correctly known - despite what the front cover and copyright page of his autobiography say, he is not "Lord Charles Brocket" (though I've created a redirect from that page). The cover of his autobiography is also a little unclear about whether we should call him Charlie or not! And almost every conceivable variation of Charles + Brocket pops up on either the dust jacket or front pages...

Can I suggest we have this at either Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket or even Charlie Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket (we have Frank Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford not Francis Pakenham, 7th Earl of Longford for instance). Timrollpickering 16:09, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

He appeared on Bad Lads Army as "Charles Brocket", not "Charlie Brocket". I think Charles Nall-Cain, 3rd Baron Brocket would be best. Proteus (Talk) 17:06, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Suggest that the materila relating to Antalya is not appropriate and irrelevant to this page - if indeed it is appropriate and relevant anywhere. Do we have any source references for it.