Talk:Charles Darwin/Comments
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
needs inline citations plange 02:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Most of the article is biography with links to more detailed biographical sections which name their sources. For example, to a large extent my contributions have drawn on Desmond and Moore's Darwin which is cited as a reference both on this page and on the relevant main articles. Footnotes for inline citations were less well developed at the time these pages were put together, and since the books listed have been used as a major source, the present citation of the books at the end of each main article with additional inline links for particular points from other sources seems appropriate. While it would theoretically be possible to go over the points and try to work out which sentence refers to which book, the result would be a mass of links to these volumes. However if there are specific points where inline citations are particularly important, please say so. ...dave souza, talk 15:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Sorry, inline citations are needed regardless if the cite is given in a See also link... --plange 17:42, 24 September 2006 (UTC)- Please note that these comments are obsolete. Charles Darwin is now probably one of the most extensively in-line cited articles in all Wikipedia. Samsara (talk • contribs) 09:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
