Talk:Charisma Carpenter

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Charisma Carpenter article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Start

This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

[edit] The Playboy Picture

I'm not complaining, but is it really that approiate? Kusonaga 14:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

shrugs Why not? WP:NOT censored. ;) —Nightst a llion (?) 14:29, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, hadn't read that bit there. Then I've got no problem with it whatsoever! Kusonaga 14:32, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

It's still not really necessary. WarpstarRider 17:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it's a very tasteful image, and much more representative of the topic than the Playboy issue's cover that was originally there. If only one Playboy image is neccessary, I think the interior picture rather than the cover is what should be here. And as far as questions of "appropriateness" go, I agree with Nigtstallion, WP:NOT's censorship section covers this. Since the article already discusses her appearance in Playboy, I see no reason not to show the image. I don't believe it is in any way obscene, or even particularly pornographic. CriticsCritic 5 February 2006 (UTC)

She is just so hot and if I had my way we would have all the playboy pics on here! :) Govvy 10:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

What's so wrong with the picture? Can somebody just put the damn picture up again? --213.200.165.75 09:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Ye, there was nothing wrong with the magazine cover of her on playboy can we have that back? Govvy 13:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

It's back! --213.200.165.75 17:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Erm guys, where's this Playboy picture?!? ArdClose (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 17:08, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Trivia sux!

Malicious gossip it should be called, implicitly calling evil demons to possess and evoke embarassing compulsive behavior over any redistributor of the subject under that section. I just wanted to see if an actress that I deem pretty gifted, having got enough roles to make a living – i did not want any anatomical details! Grr!! Twirling his moustaches, does: Rursus 11:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea of what you are trying to say here!! Govvy 12:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Poor

No way this is true that she's poor now, I can understand not having any active roles, but to be poor, this has to be a mistype.The Cleveland Browns are awesome! (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I mean, they still have the DVD sales for that show and other things that I'm sure is bringing in money for her to manage. I also found a profile for her name on facebook saying she's in college and graduating this year, is this true?The Cleveland Browns are awesome! (talk) 17:59, 14 January 2008 (UTC)