Talk:Characters of the Parasite Eve series
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Movie Section
I'm debating on this. I purposely neglected to specify the header as to leave the article's possible content ambiguous. A section detailing the movie characters sounds like a valid addition. -ZeroTalk 19:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's a bit late in the offing, but sure, I think it's a sound idea. Papacha 11:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Dr. Klamp was killedby Eve
Dr. Klamp ask Eve to take him. Aya, says: "She is going to burn the place off" Zidane tribal 08:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Can these people be considered minor characters?
I have a little complaint about this article. To me, it would seem that Daniel Dollis, Hans Klamp and Kunihiko Maeda are not minor characters. Daniel was Aya's partner and played a significant role in the game, as did Maeda. Hans Klamp is pretty much the game's antagonist so I completely disagree with him being listed as a minor character. I also disagree with Rupert, Baldwin, Pierce, Kyle, Douglas and No.9 being listed as minor characters. Baldwin played a significant role in the game, especially since he was the one leaking NMC info to the shelter. Pierce played a huge role because he tries to help Aya but Aya ends up helping him. Kyle I strongly disagree with. He was a frickin' undercover agent working for the US government. How can he be considered minor? And No.9 is the game's antagonist so that pretty much speaks for itself. --74.34.217.222 23:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I consider them to be minor characters on the basis that if they were given a single article each, they wouldn't fill up enough space. Hence minor characters. :) -74.95.99.166 20:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EVE second..jpg
Image:EVE second..jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:EVE third..jpg
Image:EVE third..jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:40, 27 October 2007 (UTC)