Talk:Changi Murals

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Changi Murals has been listed as one of the Arts good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
December 17, 2007 Good article nominee Listed
Changi Murals is part of SGpedians' Resources
An attempt to better coordinate and organise articles related to Singapore.
To participate, simply edit this page or visit our noticeboard for more info.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject England, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to articles relating to England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article associated with this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.

B-class, but could do with more references and in-line citation if possible. Good job again, nonetheless. - SpLoT // 12:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi SpLoT, I've added the in-text citation as per previous references accordingly. Thanks for your favourable assessment & compliments earlier. - Aldwinteo 04:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Since this is actually an article about paintings, don't you think some recognition of this in terms of projects, categories, and even discussion of their style in the article would be a good idea? Johnbod (talk) 22:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

According to my earlier research for this article, except for its history & basic description, there's little references on its style, categories or artistic commentaries known to date. Due to its background & the fact that the site of the paintings is located in a restricted area now, I think it somehow did not generate a follow-up by anyone to do an in-depth research on its artistic aspect in later years. Nonetheless, I welcome anyone who could direct me or include such info with relevant citation where it's available. Thank u for your interest in the article. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

That doesn't stop you adding the correct categories. Johnbod (talk) 12:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

I misunderstood your statement earlier. Nonetheless, I've added it under the "murals" category. As u r more familiar on this area, do add it under the appropriate artistic categories/projects if nec. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Done Johnbod (talk) 16:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks a lot, mate. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Passed

This article has passed the GA nominations. As always this article can always benefit from more expansion. This article can also benefit from more free pictures. If you feel that this review was in error feel free to take it to WP:GA/R. Tarret talk 21:56, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Like my previous history/heritage writings, I always research thoroughly & added whatever relevant info I could find from many possible sources, so as to improve not only the scope but also the depth of the article concerned for the benefit of Wikipedia & its readers. If time permits, I usually go on a site visit to take pictures (unless photography is not allowed on-site which happened for this case) & to seek inspiration for my writings. Thank u for your time & review in passing this article as 'Good Article'. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 00:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)