Talk:Chandramukhi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikiproject Indian cinema This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian cinema, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Indian cinema. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
WikiProject_India This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. (add comments)
This article is maintained by the Tamil Nadu workgroup.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Films. This project is a central gathering of editors working to build comprehensive and detailed articles for film topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start
This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???
This article has not yet received a rating on the priority scale.

Contents

[edit] Correct Box office figures

Did this film really collect 110 crores? Any evidence to substantiate the fact?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nrupatunga (talkcontribs) 07:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] How is this movie notable?

How exactly is the film notable? The "review" is just advertisement. Pavel Vozenilek 14:13, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Agreed

I agree with the previous comment. I have watched the movie and i know that there is quite a bit more that can be discussed in the article. The article can atleast state a few more essential details, like cast, crew, etc.

[edit] Will be updated soon

It was a comeback movie for Rajini Kanth, was one of the recent Blockbuster in South India. Movie profits grossed over 50 crores cummulatively in Kollywood and Tollywood. I will update with proper details. --M.arunprasad 12:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reduce trivia

There have been some good edits recently. One thing that could be worked on is to start reducing the size of the Trivia list. Per WP:TRIVIA, we should start relocating these items to elsewhere in the article, where appropriate.  Jim Dunning  talk  :  16:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


Has the movie crossed 768 days....

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Chandramukhi.jpg

Image:Chandramukhi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Bhool Bhuliya

Bhool Bhuliya, starring Akshay Kumar and Vidya Balan, and realease in 2007, is also similar to ChandraMukhi. Akshay Kumar plays the role similar to Rajnikanth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.155.101.204 (talk) 03:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)