Characidae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2007) |
Characidae Fossil range: Upper Miocene - Recent[1] |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bleeding heart tetra Hyphessobrycon erythrostigma
|
||||||||||||||||||
Scientific classification | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Subfamilies and Genera[2] | ||||||||||||||||||
Subfamily Agoniatinae
Subfamily Aphyocharacinae
Subfamily Bryconinae
Subfamily Characinae
Subfamily Cheirodontinae
Subfamily Clupeacharacinae
Subfamily Glandulocaudinae
Subfamily Iguanodectinae
Subfamily Rhoadsiinae
Subfamily Serrasalminae
Subfamily Stethaprioninae
Subfamily Tetragonopterinae
|
The Characidae, characids or characins are a family of freshwater subtropical and tropical fish, belonging to the order Characiformes. The name "characins" is the historical one, but scientists today tend to prefer "characids" to reflect their status as a by and large monophyletic group at family rank. To arrive there, this family has undergone much systematic and taxonomic change. Among those fishes that remain in the Characidae for the time being are the tetras, comprising the very similar genera Hemigrammus and Hyphessobrycon, as well as a few related forms such as the cave and neon tetras. Fish of this family are important as food and also include popular aquarium fish species.[2]
These fish vary in length, though many are less than 3 centimetres (1 in). The smallest species[citation needed] grows to a maximum length of 13 millimetres (0.5 in).[1]
These fish inhabit a wide range and a variety of habitats. They originate in the Americas from southwestern Texas and Mexico through Central and South America.[2] Many of these fish come from rivers, but for example the blind cave tetra even inhabits caves.
Contents |
[edit] Systematics
This family has undergone a large amount of systematic and taxonomic change. More recent revision has moved many former members of the family into their own related but distinct families - the pencilfishes of the genus Nannostomus are a typical example, having now been moved into the Lebiasinidae, the assorted predatory species belonging to Hoplias and Hoplerythrinus have now been moved into the Erythrinidae, and the sabre-toothed fishes of the genus Hydrolycus have been moved into the Cynodontidae. The formner subfamily Alestiinae was promoted to family level (Alestiidae) and the subfamilies Crenuchinae and Characidiinae were moved to the family Crenuchidae.[2]
Other fish families that were formerly classified as members of the Characidae, but which were moved into separate families of their own during recent taxonomic revisions (post-1994) include Acestrorhynchidae, Anostomidae, Chilodontidae, Citharinidae, Ctenoluciidae, Curimatidae, Distichodontidae, Gasteropelecidae, Hemiodontidae, Hepsetidae, Parodontidae, and Prochilodontidae.[citation needed]
The larger piranhas were originally classified as belonging to the Characidae, but various revisions place them in their own related family, the Serrasalmidae. This reassignment has yet to enjoy universal acceptance, but is gaining in popularity among taxonomists working with these fishes. Given the current state of flux of the Characidae, a number of other changes will doubtless take place, reassigning once-familiar species to other families. Indeed, the entire phylogeny of the Ostariophysi - fishes possessing a Weberian apparatus - has yet to be conclusively settled. Until that phylogeny is settled, the opportunity for yet more upheavals within the taxonomy of the characoid fishes is considerable.
[edit] Genera incertae sedis
A large number of taxa in this family are incertae sedis. The relationships of many fish in this family are poorly known,[2] a comprehensive phylogenetic study for the entire family is needed.[1] The genera Hyphessobrycon, Astyanax, Hemigrammus, Moenkhausia, and Bryconamericus include the largest number of currently recognized species among characid fishes that are in need of revision;[3] Astyanax and Hyphessobrycon in the usual delimitation are among the largest genera in this family.[2] These genera were originally proposed between 1854 and 1908 and are still more or less defined as by Carl H. Eigenmann in 1917, even though diverse species have been added to each genus since that time. The anatomical diversity within each genus, the fact that each of these generic groups at the present time cannot be well-defined, and the high number of species involved are the major reasons for the lack of phylogenetic analyses dealing with the relationships of the species within these generic "groups".[3]
- Astyanax (astynaxes, about 100 species)
- Boehlkea
- Bryconamericus
- Bryconops
- Ceratobranchia
- Chalceus
- Deuterodon
- Exodon (Bucktooth Tetra)
- Gymnocorymbus
- Hasemania
- Hemibrycon
- Hemigrammus
- Hyphessobrycon (about 100 species)
- Inpaichthys
- Jupiaba
- Knodus
- Moenkhausia
- Myxiops
- Nematobrycon
- Oligosarcus
- Paracheirodon
- Petitella
- Pseudochalceus
- Rachoviscus
- Roeboexodon
- Schultzites
- Thayeria (penguinfishes)
- Tyttobrycon
[edit] Footnotes
[edit] References
- "Characidae". FishBase. Ed. Rainer Froese and Daniel Pauly. Apr 2007 version. N.p.: FishBase, 2007.
- de Lucena, Carlos Alberto Santos (2003): New characid fish, Hyphessobrycon scutulatus, from the rio Teles Pires drainage, upper rio Tapajós system (Ostariophysi: Characiformes: Characidae). Neotropical Ichthyology 1(2): 93-96. PDF fulltext
- Géry, Jacques (1977): Characoids of the World. ISBN 0-87666-458-3
- Nelson, Joseph S. (2006): Fishes of the World. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 0471250317