User talk:CespiT

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, CespiT! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Image:Signature icon.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Tyrenius 23:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

[edit] Guide to referencing

Click on "show" to open contents.

[edit] D*Dog

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of D*Dog, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://murdervision.blogspot.com/2005_09_01_archive.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 13:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of D*Dog

D*Dog, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that D*Dog satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/D*Dog and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of D*Dog during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Coren (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Dface_flybye.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Dface_flybye.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 14:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

I noticed you're new to WP, and just want to say welcome! I read your arguments on the AfD for D*Face and while I !voted for deletion, I have to say that you make a compelling argument. However, per WP:V, the main thing we're after in articles is verifiability, not truth. This can (unfortunately) sometimes lead to the deletion of deserving articles, simply from lack of sufficient sources. I just want to say that should the article be deleted, don't take it personally. Sometimes we can put a lot of hard work into an article, just to have others change/delete it. Such are the hazards with wikis. Again, welcome! :) Faithlessthewonderboy 22:53, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Improve it by studying the reference guide above on this page, and providing facts properly referenced by reliable sources. Tyrenius 23:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)