User talk:Censusdata
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Billy Gillispie article
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Billy Gillispie, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SonPraises 02:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair-use image on user page
I haveremoved a non-free image from your user page. Please be advised that Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Wikipedia policy does not allow templates (which includes userboxes) or user pages to contain any copyrighted content not under free license; so, for example, "fair use" images are explicitly forbidden. This clause is to be interpreted strictly and without exception, for legal reasons. You can research Wikipedia's fair use policy guidelines for more details.
For images and other media that are freely available for use in userpages and userboxes, check out Wikimedia Commons. Thanks. --Fritz S. (Talk) 10:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fuel economy reply
I'm not exactly sure, but I believe infoboxes have set fields; that there is a template somewhere with the current fields in it and that it can be modified to include fuel economy. I'd ask at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles, both to find out how it can be done and to see if other editors agree that it's a useful addition. IFCAR 14:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Trolling
Talk pages are for the discussion of articles. They are not a venue for you to air your personal opinions about Catholics. Please stop. IrishGuy talk 01:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Please don't make me warn you again. Stop trolling. IrishGuy talk 01:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Timothy
Sometimes, it is important to assume that the Church is wiser than we are. Gavin Scott 09:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
As I said, we must assume that they are wiser than we are. Ofcourse, we know they are. Gavin Scott 16:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Reply to user:Seicer
Your edit, to a featured article, did not have a reliable source and citation. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 01:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
It is my belief after a long time of theological study and church history that the RMC is the one true church- it is the supreme branch there is no doubt, they even constructed the bible. However, I believe that God cares about the content of your character opposed to what Church you go to. Worship him and no other and you shall be saved. However, your prayers mean more to me than you could possibly know. Gavin Scott 21:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Super Regionals
Check the NCAA record book here: http://www.ncaa.org/library/records/baseball/baseball_champs_records/2006/d1/2006_d1_baseball_champ_records.pdf. It's the 2006 version. Super Regionals started in 1999 so you'll just have to manually check every year since then. I don't know of any sites where one could easily glean that type of information. College baseball isn't as thoroughly covered as some other sports, unfortunately. Seancp 00:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] re
Regarding the redirect I restored (New Testament Church), it's not my page and if you feel it warrants it's own article fine, remember be bold! However, that doesn't mean you can rant on my talk page and make frivolous accusations of vandalism. Have a quick read of this WP:CIVIL while you calm down.--The internet is serious business 20:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
See Talk page on Council (sic) of Jerusalem.Roger Arguile 14:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] College Baseball Project
Hello, I noticed that you have edited a College baseball related article. You may be interested to know that there is a college baseball WikiProject which you can join if you like. We would love to have you!
[edit] Info about Louisville places template
I just wanted to let you know that the template also has northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast parameters if you need them. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 16:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] reference syntax
Please be careful about using correct reference syntax. One of your recent edits ended up pulling half a paragraph into a reference which made the article quite confusing :) Kaldari 22:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] More personal attacks and trolling
Please stop. Continued behavior like this will likely result in a block. See edit summaries here, here, and here. --Sable232 17:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Advice to Angry Aspie: It's best to keep personal stuff out of edit disputes. But if you feel you're correct, keep arguing on the merits, but in the article's talk -- remember WP:3RR. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano
A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. hbdragon88 01:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD Nomination: Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cesar Ivan Aguilar-Cano. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. hbdragon88 05:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tundra
There is no reason whatsoever for the head image to be the latest one. None of the available images of 2007 models are especially good, so they do not belong there. Do not revert. IFCAR 13:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Kentucky public university ACT scores graphic
I was looking at the graphic you posted featuring median ACT scores for Kentucky's state universities, and noticed a mistake that needs fixing. You have "NKU" listed twice. The gold bar is correct. The green bar needs "KSU", as it represents Kentucky State University. Thanks... :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 21:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Your pictures
I like some of your pictures. Do you remember where you took Image:Picture 1281.jpg was taken. I'd love to use it on the Kentucky portal. Thanks.--Bedford 06:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
In a similar vein, when you were taking pictures in Portland, did you happen to take one of the Portland Museum? I've thought about starting the article, and if you've already taken a photo, I don't need to take more. Thanks.--Bedford 16:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wind gusts in tornadoes
They have never been included in articles (per a 2006 mention:)
http://www.srh.weather.gov/jetstream/mesoscale/tornado.htm "The F-scale is to be used with great caution. Tornado wind speeds are still largely unknown; and the wind speeds on the F-scale have never been scientifically tested and proven. Different winds may be needed to cause the same damage depending on how well-built a structure is, wind direction, wind duration, battering by flying debris, and a bunch of other factors."
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/#f-scale1 "Tornado wind speeds are still largely unknown; and the wind speeds on the original F-scale have never been scientifically tested and proven. Different winds may be needed to cause the same damage depending on how well-built a structure is, wind direction, wind duration, battering by flying debris, and a bunch of other factors. Also, the process of rating the damage itself is largely a judgment call -- quite inconsistent and arbitrary (Doswell and Burgess, 1988). Even meteorologists and engineers highly experienced in damage survey techniques often came up with different F-scale ratings for the same damage."
"So if the original F-scale winds are just guesses, why are they so specific? Excellent question. Those winds were arbitrarily attached to the damage scale based on 12-step mathematical interpolation between the hurricane criteria of the Beaufort wind scale, and the threshold for Mach 1 (738 mph). Though the F-scale actually peaks at F12 (Mach 1), only F1 through F5 are used in practice, with F0 attached for tornadoes of winds weaker than hurricane force. Again, F-scale wind-to-damage relationships are untested, unknown and purely hypothetical. They have never been proven and may not represent real tornadoes. F-scale winds should not be taken literally."
No doubt wonderful sources. However, there was nothing hypothetical or debatable about the extent and size of the destruction in Xenia. It was F-5 (or EF-5), one mile wide through the heart of a city, any way you look at it. It took a diesel locomotive--one quarter of a million pounds--lifted it up and turned it over. That is no myth--I saw it with my own eyes.--Buckboard 22:06, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
CrazyC83 (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Happy First Day of Spring!
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:36410923 e5c1ac3302 o.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:36410923 e5c1ac3302 o.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
