Talk:Centennial Collegiate Vocational Institute
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. |
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
|
 |
Contents |
[edit] Fraiser magazine Citation
A google search for "Fraiser magazine" yields no results. However, does this citation (which has been removed for reasons outlined below) mean the Fraser Institute? This ranking should be cited.
A search around the Fraser institutes publically available documents did not yield anything for the terms "Centennial" that corresponded to the ranking of this highschool.
A search for the school rankings located this document: [http://oldfraser.lexi.net/publications/studies/education/report_card/2001/ont/section_06.html ] Which does not list C.C.V.I. as 18th in the province, but tied for 120th with a score of 7.6. So, until the citation can be located that has C.C.V.I. ranked as 18th overall in the province, I would suggest that the text regarding its overall quality is deleted.
Further, this document from the fraser institute [1] is for grade and academic performance for the 1998/99 academic year. Hardly a recent result. Considering at least 2 full classes have moved through the school in this time, it hardly makes sense to use it as a current marker of this schools academic record.
This reference was added by ip user. So, the above argument is really moot.
[edit] Problems with maturity for a highschool's webpage
This definitely needs to be fixed, but I'm not sure the best way to write this article.
I think I can help with this. Make it more professional, etc. I'm a student at this school, though, so if you're reading this please check over the article itself to make sure my neutrality isn't comprimised. UnitedStatesOfCanadia 20:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Green Team
Green is too insignificant to get it's own section or even be mentioned in this page, so I deleted it. Feel free to put it back up if you want. Caje47 05:59, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Caje47
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Ccvi2007.JPG
Image:Ccvi2007.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
