User talk:Celiakozlowski

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Celiakozlowski, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Contents

[edit] Uploading Somerset pics

Thanks for your message. Your upload of Image:BridgewaterBay.jpg and Image:Barringtonct1.jpg appear to have worked fine. You now need to go to the relevant article ie Bridgwater Bay and Barrington Court and edit the articles. You will then see the 6th button along is for adding images. Click on this and replace "Example.jpg" with the image name. You will also need to add |thumb to make the image smaller and ideally a caption as well. see Wikipedia:Picture tutorial for much more detailed info. You should be able to add yourself as a member at Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset by going to the participants section & clicking on "edit" & then add yourself using the format the others have used. Hope this helps & get back to me if it is unclear.— Rod talk 21:07, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

The "edit this page" button at the top will enable you to edit anything on the page - but if you go down to the participants section & click on edit next to that it will just show you that section.— Rod talk 21:21, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I badgered Celia into uploading the photos in the first place, so I'll help out with adding them to articles. JamesMLane t c 23:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Burrowbridgeconfluence.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Burrowbridgeconfluence.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 12:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Burrow Mump

Well done for adding your pics & starting the Burrow Mump article - why not announce it on Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset#New articles?— Rod talk 06:42, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] On to Long Sutton and a suggestion for a good Somerset page topic

Thanks for the further pics. I think an article on Somerset towers would be a great idea - you might want to look at Buildings and architecture of Bristol for an example of an architecture article which pulls together lots of bits - if you want to do it out of the glare of other editors you could start a page in your Sandbox to practice with first?. If you want help just let me know. NB you wrote "I noticed on your page that you were planning" - the Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset is not mine it's everybodies & you are welcome to add (or remove) items from it.— Rod talk 07:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stained glass pics

I like the pics of stained glass windows at Drayton, Somerset. Do you have a similar picture from Pawlett, Somerset as I've put this one up as a suggestion for "Did you know" (see Sept 26th with the hook "...that the Norman church in Pawlett, Somerset has a stained glass window showing Christ blessing children who are in modern dress and holding a teddy bear and toy boat?" & it would be nice to be able to illustrate it.— Rod talk 08:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image source problem with Image:Northcurrychurch.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Northcurrychurch.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 20:33, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lytes Cary Manor

Hi Celia, I don't see any problem with Lytes Cary Manor on my screen - what browser & screen resolution are you using? Have fun in Pawlett.— Rod talk 11:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I use firefox as well - I think it must be that you are on a different screen resolution. I've added a couple of lines of white space around ref, ext links & gallery - but I think other editors will remove them. I look forward to the Pawlett pics.— Rod talk 21:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] A start on Somerset Towers...

Hi Celia, I hope you had a good Christmas. I like the start you have made on Somerset Towers, but you need to be careful of "peacck phrases" ( eg "beautiful" "crowning glory") as these will not get through WP:NPOV. I can probably add some more pics & some info. You might want to look at Template:Convert for heights, units etc. I think a little more text in each of the "sections" would be useful explaining what makes these churches group together. Have you also thought about the church bells - most of which were made by the Bilbie family Great work so far & let me know anything I can do to help.— Rod talk 09:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Othery

Hi Celia, Ages ago I remember you had made a start in a sandbox on an article about Othery. I've now added this village to the requests at Wikipedia:WikiProject Somerset & I wondered if you could put your start into Othery as it would be waste if someone else started working on the same article?— Rod talk 18:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Brilliant thanks - I've added a few tweaks myself.— Rod talk 22:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Greetings from darkest Surrey...

Hiya! Just because I happen to be interested in a subject doesn't close off the possibility that I know fuck all about it... admittedly, I DO know a fair bit about Bath Abbey, and about Downside, but I have basically discovered most of it by reading up on the web for my Bath rewrite... My other big thing as far as Somerset is concerned is the Somerset & Dorset Railway (centred around the old Bath Green Park to Bournemouth West main line, inexplicably closed in the 1960s)... I am also of some use wherever I go when it comes to pipe organs - the very comprehensive sections in the Bath and Downside articles on the organs are my work. Anyway, thanks for the welcome, and go easy on a Somerset-noob! :-) --Vox Humana 8' 23:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Publicity for Somerset WikiProject

Thanks for your comments - my own feeling is that the more the merrier. My sister in-law works for HTV newsroom & says they hate Internet stories - however I have got bits into Chew Valley Gazette & Mendip Times particularly related to getting relevant stories to FA & them appearing on the front page. — Rod talk 20:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

I don't know the context this was written in, but if you are looking for ways to publicise the project, blogs and other online communities may be a fruitful avenue. For example, http://my.telegraph.co.uk/. It would probably be ok to make a post about new aritcles, or GA FA status. 'Somerset' and 'wikipedia' get tagged sometimes, and comments can be left. Derek Andrews (talk) 11:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Somerset towers

Hi Celia, The other day I picked up a copy of "Churches of Somerset" by A.K.Wickham (1965) in the library & it has a whole chapter on the towers based on Allen's classification. I was wondering if you were getting close to making your article public, or would you be willing for me to edit the article in your sandbox (something we don't normally do)? I just wanted to make good use of the book before I need to return it.— Rod talk 15:25, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I've made a start on formatting, refs etc & done some expansion - I've put some comments on the talk page attached to the article in your sandbox - I will monitor this so probably best to continue discussion there.— Rod talk 18:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
No worries re deletions - edit conflicts happen - I've put them back in. I'm stopping for tonight & will do more another time - any reordering of sections is OK by me.— Rod talk 22:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi good to see you editing again. I wondered what your thoughts are now about the towers article. I think it would be best to just adopt one of the schemes (possibly the first) & just say where others disagree about the classification. If you don't want to work on it further, it might just be an idea to put it out into the public domain, with a note on the talk page about problems & issues, and let others work on it as well as you? What do you think?— Rod talk 20:45, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Well done for all your extra work on Somerset Tower I've added categories & project banners etc & also nominated it at Template talk:Did you know. We can leave the title & see what others think. Once it has been reviewed by a few people I think you should nominate it at WP:GAC.— Rod talk 09:33, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
I've rated the article as "B" class and think you should be looking at Wikipedia:Good article criteria & then nominating it at Wikipedia:Good article nominations.— Rod talk 08:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Are you happy for me to remove the claims (in picture captions) that St. Mary's, Huish Episcopi is "A classic Somerset Tower" & St. Mary's, Norton Sub Hamdon "An uncommonly perfect church" & St. George church, Hinton St George "A good Perp church" as someone has added a citation needed tags (unless you have sources for these claims) - then I think it should be nominated for GA - what do you think?— Rod talk 15:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks - I've sorted the references & nominated for GA - the feedback will be helpful in improving the article.— Rod talk 11:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

(outdent) Have you seen the comments about the length of the page? Would you be happy for me to remove some of the pictures &/or the quotes?— Rod talk 07:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] DYK

Updated DYK query On 16 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Somerset Towers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Cirt (talk) 12:35, 16 April 2008 (UTC)