User talk:Cedricpalmer2k

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on dateOfNomination. The result of the discussion was result.
This article was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on debate closure date with a consensus to merge the content into the article destination article. If the merger is not completed promptly, this article might be re-nominated for deletion. To discuss the merger, please use the destination article's talk page.
The article nominated article was nominated for deletion. The debate was closed on debate closure date with a consensus to merge the content into User:Cedricpalmer2k. If the merger is not completed promptly, nominated article might be re-nominated for deletion.

To discuss the merger, please use this talk page.
This article was considered for deletion and requires cleanup according to the discussion.
Please help improve this article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards or discuss the issue on the talk page. (May 2008)

{{Cleanup-afd|Qwertyuiop

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cedricpalmer2k (talk) 04:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Page
Miscellany for deletion This page was nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was keep.
Miscellany for deletion This page was nominated for deletion on date of nomination. The result of the discussion was result.


[edit] Deletion review for cedricpalmer2k

An editor has asked for a deletion review of cedricpalmer2k. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Cedricpalmer2k (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2008 (UTC)