Talk:Cedar Hill, Texas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Economic & Future Developments
I don't believe the economic development section, and to a degree the future development section, are on par with wikipedia's standards. Is this a wikipedia entry or a chamber of commerce commercial?
User: Coffee and TV 10:22 August 27, 2007
Well, everything I read there is true (albeit unsourced). Cedar Hill has gone from a sleepy little backwater to growing retail locations and housing at a phenomenal rate - which I think is a notable fact. I guess it's debatable whether it's all notable enough for inclusion at that level of detail - but I don't think any of it hurts in any way. Someone coming to find out about Cedar Hill might very well be interested in all of that detail. I don't think it crosses the line into being a commercial. But it really could use some references for all of those facts. SteveBaker 19:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GovtCtr1207A.jpg
Image:GovtCtr1207A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
-
- This image should be deleted - I've removed it from the article. The building is close enough to completion - someone should take a free-use image of it. SteveBaker (talk) 13:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)