Talk:Catholicos of The East and Malankara Metropolitan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by the Syriac Christianity work group. (with unknown importance) | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India. See also the Christianity in India Portal. (rated as High importance) | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
Category tag to Christianity in India related articles.
Contents |
[edit] Picture
The picture needs to be shrunk. Takes up too much whitespace at the top. Student7 (talk) 22:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Honorifics
Eliminated abbreviated honorifics. Okay to give title once before each person but wasn't sure what that was so didn't insert them. Student7 (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Possible OR because of lack of references
You have an interesting article. I have learned a lot. However, both sides have to be presented equally in this article about legitimacy. No side can be perceived to have "won" unless the other side concedes which they won't. Therefore, documents cannot be presented in raw format and conclusions drawn. Rather, arguments have to be drawn from scholars or people of authority on either side. Otherwise we violate WP:OR by appearing to put forward a new argument or say that the opponents argument fails on inspection. Having said that, the raw material may be presented without comment. However, the conclusion may not be apparent to the casual reader!Student7 (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Erased OR and lack of references
I've tried to explain why the OR citation was needed aa well as why references were needed. Both times, these have been deleted. These really need to be left in. I will ask for a third opinion. Then we will try arbitration. I would rather avoid both, if possible. Student7 (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
OUTSIDE OPINION I would say yes- there are almost no references in the entire article, and those that are here are all in the bottom sections. It would be helpful if the other editor gave an explanation here. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
OUTSIDE OPINION Yes, definitely. There are three sources cited: one is a defunct website. The other 2 are a personal website and the website of a local church--neither are reliable. Since no reliable sources are cited, inclusion of original research in the article is quite likely, and more sources and citations are certainly needed. Keep the banners until the problem is fixed. If no reliable sources are available to confirm any of the content, then delete the whole thing. Nick Graves (talk) 01:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Moving article
Please stop moving this article without discussion. Student7 (talk) 12:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
