Talk:Cat lady

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Article bias

This article is incredibly biaised against cat ladies. It should either be deleted or shortened, or be re-written to show both view points for and against cat ladies. In the article's current state, several sections present a very unbalanced opinion about cat ladies. Canjth (talk) 01:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I think this article should be reverted back to the time when it was a disambiguation page (here). Any salvageable content should be merged back into the existing Animal hoarding article. -- Bovineone (talk) 18:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I second that. In addition, the article does not even "feel" like a Wikipedia article. If its not going to be reverted/merged, it needs to be wikified. --Ts1and2fanatic (talk) 01:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I also agree. I will add a wikify tag to the top of the page, but I think that it should definitely be maerged into the Animal hoarder page. The information is hardly notable enough to qualify it for its own page. Skittlesrgood4u (talk) 21:43, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

It certainly lacks neutrality. - Jman

I agree, the article is very one-sided. Jack324 (talk) 06:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree. The article should be merged into Animal hoarding and the disambiguation page reinstated. --WikiCats (talk) 04:30, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I've taken the action of quickly merging the content into Animal hoarding and then reverted this to the disambig page. Everyone should please feel welcome to try to address the NPOV, tone, and redundancy issues that now exist in the Animal hoarding page. -- Bovineone (talk) 04:56, 1 March 2008 (UTC)