User talk:Casdious

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 January 2008 2 Your attempted split of Erection 3 Erection split 4 The freak (comics)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added to the page Erection do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jauerback (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your attempted split of Erection

While you're encouraged to be bold, remember not to be reckless. When considering making a substantial change that would be controversial, you should take the time to discuss first, and establish a consensus on the matter. To propose a split you can add {{template:split-apart}} to the page, and then add the corresponding discussion on the talk page, but in a situation like this you should wait for that discussion to play out first before going ahead with this major change TheBilly (talk) 20:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Erection split

Hi! I've redirected both erection (clitoral) and erection (nipple) back to their respective sections in the main article. Second thought - I might have been a hothead on this, but the sections themselves are too short to warrant their own articles, they fit nicely as sections. Waiting for your comments on this. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 18:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello. You went the right way about sending messages - so no trouble here. Anyway, okay, understand your rationale perfectly as well, though - the sections on clitoral and nipple erections are just stubs, two, three sentences. Can you expand them, include the mechanics and specifics? If so, I am definitely for the split. But look for community consensus first, do not split articles yourself - this article would be in the scope of WikiProject Biology, turn to them, or do you want me to do this for you? They don't seem that active, but they are there. Cheers, Ouro (blah blah) 07:20, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The freak (comics)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article The freak (comics), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)