Talk:Cassius Khan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
|
More information about this article...
|
|
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to musicians and musical groups on Wikipedia. | ||
 |
An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article, or the current infobox may need to be updated. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information. |
It really is too bad that somebody( I have the IP address) is trying to adulterate this article. At least show yourself.
It is too bad. Maybe you should show the IP address of that person, since they are in the same area.Some people are jealous of this kind and humble maestro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshorab (talk • contribs) 15:38, 11 October 2007 (UTC) The IP address of that person who I will not name is 209.53.214.179.
Once again the name of the person is Junior Thirakwa, here is his IP 142.179.211.28, he wrote a lot of bad things, but we will press charges, as an investigation is under way. he also visits another site called www.tabla.com in the forums, we will find him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshorab (talk • contribs) 18:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
THE PAGE ADULTERER OF CASSIUS KHAN HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED AS AARON GERSHFIELD
www.aarongershfieldnewyork.com/ wiki/wiki.php?wiki=Cassius_Khan - 17k - Cached - Similar pages
IF YOU CLICK ON THAT LINK, YOU WILL FIND THE ADULTERATED ARTICLE ON THE PAGE, THIS GUY IS SICK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sshorab (talk • contribs) 15:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Not... /quite/ Wikified
Hi chaps, just dropping by randomly. I thought I had to add the 'needs wikified' tab to the article because, frankly, it does. I'm not saying that any of the information on this page is false, I'm entirely willing to believe it to be true, but articles in an encyclopedia aren't supposed to sound quite as explicitly hagiographic as this article does. Some citations here and there might help, but ultimately a fresh start with a less devotional emphasis might be in order. Also I'm pretty sure 'outing' editors is not standard er... 'wikilove': if you have problems with an editor you can deal with them through official channels. DuncanCrowe (talk)
