Talk:Cashville Records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cashville Records article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Business and Economics (Rated stub-Class) Business and economics Portal This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. Stub rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale Mid rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale WikiProject G-Unit Records (Rated stub-Class) This article is part of WikiProject G-Unit Records, an ongoing effort to improve all articles related to G-Unit Records and its artists. The goal of the project is to bring this article, along with all others to featured status. If you have any questions, concerns or wish to participate you can visit the main project page, here. Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) WikiProject Hip hop (Rated stub-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Hip hop, an ongoing effort to improve articles related to hip hop culture and hip hop music. The goal of the project is to bring this article, along with all others to featured status. If you have any questions, concerns or wish to participate you can visit the main project page here. Stub This article has been rated as stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article was nominated for deletion on March 9, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.