Talk:Caserma Ederle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

This article may be too technical for a general audience. Please help improve this article by providing more context and better explanations of technical details to make it more accessible, without removing technical details.

[edit] Technical and cleanup-restructure

What exactly does "dependent" mean in "A soldier assigned to a tour of duty at Caserma Ederle is normally permitted to bring dependents for the Permanent Change of Station."? The link redirects to a disambiguation page. Why is it in the introduction of the article? It seems to be a detail to me. Cleanup and explanation needed. Thanks. --Edcolins 22:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

The person that wrote that means dependent (law) - in this case, a spouse, children under 21 or 23 (23 only if a full-time student) or permanently disabled, parents if permanently disabled - the problem is, that's a red link right now. — CJewell (talk to me) 14:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I added the link. Even if red, it is better than to have a link leading to the disambiguation page, IMHO. A stub could be created with the matter already in the disambiguation page (three lines, not that bad...) --Edcolins 20:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Family Members

Family members is now the common usage recognized within the DoD community.
The term military dependent is somewhat dated (i.e. Pre-1990).
v/r
Peter Rimar
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chitrapa (talk • contribs) 03:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC).

[edit] What is that?!?

Who have wrote these idiot things?

"The Communist Refoundation Party (PRC), the Party of Italian Communists (PDCI), the Greens, and a part of the Democrats of the Left (DS) and of the Margherita parties opposed the plan by organising a two-days opposition protest during which participants repeatedly tried to break into the base and/or to throw Molotov flammable bottlebombs at cars or people who were supposed to be American"

These things had never happened, as i'm italian and i know about it. This is an outrageous disinformation.