Talk:Case Closed

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Case Closed article.
Article policies
Archives: 1, 2
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve and expand anime and manga related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Other languages WikiProject Echo has identified Case Closed as a foreign language featured article. You may be able to improve this article with information from the Tagalog language Wikipedia.


Contents

[edit] Case Closed: The Fourteenth Target & other Movies

Hi guys. I am not sure if this belongs here, but I need some help with editied the second movie of Case Closed. I am trying to improve the article, and I am currently working on the plot section. I'd like to make it at least as good as the previus movie. Any help would be appreiciated. The page needs a good copy/edit, more info added to the plot, sources, and more info in new wiki-chart I made. I post this here, instead of in the articles that need expansions spot, because I figure you guys might have seen the movie(sense yoru reading the Case Closed talk page), and it will take some people who have seen the movie to improve the article. So if you can help out, go to the the that artciles talk page , or start editing it now. Thanks in advance. - Prede (talk) 00:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

There is a Survey regarding name changes in the movies, if anyone wishes to participate in it, it's right here . I don't care too strongly about this, but this way more can vote in this and we can deal with it sooner. - Prede (talk) 02:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Use the japanese names, I beg of you. More people would be able to watch it then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spinningfox (talk • contribs) 06:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Why not Detective Conan?

The article says that this anime is known in Japan and in MOST countries as Detective Conan. Yet, it was titled as Case Closed. Just because it is called as Case Closed in United States and that Wikimedia Foundation is in United States, you will favor the title "Case Closed" more. I thought Wikipedia is an international encyclopedia. Does the number of those who know this series as Case Closed surpasses the number of those who know it as Detective Conan? eStaRapapax xapaparatse! exsatpaarpa! 22:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

I just realized there was an ongoing discussion about the title. Sorry, I haven't come across it at first. Well, I'll just leave this post here. I don't want to add my comment on the above discussion. There's already a bunch of serious guys there who've said what I've said. eStaRapapax xapaparatse! exsatpaarpa! 22:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, also every time a name is brought up they have it in english, why I wonder did they change the names to things so dumb, their names were fine. Now we've got Japanese people with names like Jimmy, do you know how ashamed I felt being an American when I found out we called him Jimmy? Why didn't they just keep the names the same... but that's not the question for hereSpinningfox (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a fansite. And, per policy, this website is for English speakers only, and by English speakers it refers to Anglosphere.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 12:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I disagree. English is already being taught at schools throughout the world. English today is not limited to the Angloshere you're talking about. I came from the Philippines and I know most Filipinos can understand the English Wikipedia. People from other ASEAN countries like Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and East Timor can understand English as well. They may not be fluent in speaking it but at least they can read the English Wikipedia. eStaRapapax xapaparatse! exsatpaarpa!

[edit] Movies Section

Sense the issues has been raised, what do you think better orginizes the Movie Section on this page. I think the chart does wonders, it orginizes it in a very neat, useful way. I think it used to be in prose form a long time ago, but this made it look less sloppy. So should it be left alone (stay in wiki-chart form) , or be made into "prose" (written) form? - Prede (talk) 05:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

To "offically" ad in my view, I strongly feel the section should be prose. The movies should be listed in release order, with the titles in the proper {{nihongo}} template, details on director/producer (where different, release date, a short (1-2 brief sentences) summary, and English licensing. The current table really just lists titles and release making it little more than a catalog. The first two paragraphs of the section, on movies 10 and 12, are a partial implementation of that idea. Prose is neat and tidy, particularly when well written. If the section gets too long, which is likely with the number of films, then they can be broken off into an appropriate list, and the section here reduced to a lead out to that. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh, well what we used to have there was nothing more then the names of the movies, year they were released, and amount of money they made, written in prose (I think). That's why they made it into a chart so long ago. If there is enough info to turn the whole movie section, into something similar to the first two paragraphs of the section, then it would be nice to add to this article. I thought you meant remove the chart, and just write out (almost in a list) money they made, and year released, and title(nothing more). That is what was there, and that is what looked messy, so they turned it into a chart. For now though, the chart works. I don't know if there is enough info to make the whole section like the begining, but if there isn't we should just keep the chart indefinitely. - Prede (talk) 06:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
You could write a short paragraph saying a Detective Conan film has been released every April since 1997 and split the chart into a stand alone list, like what AutoGyro did with Lupin III's TV specials section.--Nohansen (talk) 15:30, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
The problem is, Collectonian, you have removed the incoming numbers, together with the citations.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 15:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Most of the box office numbers were unreferenced, and that belongs in the reception section. That, however, has no relevance to whether or not the movies should be listed in prose or a table. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 17:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced? Check this diff again, you actually removed the references for box office numbers. OK, those websites did not work any more, but when I added them, they worked. I thought links that don't work any more can still be references.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 17:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
The paragraph above them was referenced (and in absolutely horrible fashion...over 10 links shoved in a single REF!). The links don't work, however, so they can not be verified. Dead links must be replaced in order to still be references, with with the updated link (if moved) or an archive link (if available). -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Why not use < br / >, in the chart? other charts use them(where needed) for displaying the English and Japanese names of Movies(Tv speaciles), and it helps orginize it. As of now, it is starting to look a bit messy, and streches the column over more then neccessay. Either use < br / >, or create a new column for kanji and Romanized titles of the movie. - Prede (talk) 18:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
The BR is unnecessary, and it doesn't look messy at all to me. Its supposed to fill the column, that's kind of how a table set to fill the width works. The titles should not be put in separate columns. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 18:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
What is everyone else's thought's on this? I just think it looks ( a little) messy , and useing BR would clean that up. A new column would work too. I don't mind that much though. Just a suggestion... - Prede (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
The table is meant to be turned into prose eventually anyway, right? If so, there's little reason to worry about how it looks. Regardless of that, though, I feel that neither <br/> nor a seperate column are necessary, and that the table looks fine now the way it is. —Dinoguy1000 19:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] List of Hiroshi Agasa's inventions

It has been nominated for deletion. Should it be deleted or stay? Voice your opinion here. I have stated why I believe it should stay at that link. - Prede (talk) 19:24, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The proposed deletion of several DC/CC character articles, per WP:FICT

I have no reason to believe the following DC/CC character articles would possible to have off-universe notability in the forseeable future:

Although I'm not prodding or afdding them yet, but I want relevant editors consider merging them into List of Case Closed characters.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 17:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

I have raised an AfD for these articles. Please discuss accordingly.--Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 20:57, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
The only one I can consider keeping is Chianti, sense she is in a few episodes. However sense I have not seen past episode 83, I don't really know how important she is. If all these characters are minor, please merge all the important info (and the sources I found for them) to their section on the character page. I did do some work fixing up their sources, so it be nice if you keep that info alive. - Prede (talk) 23:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
If you have time, you can move those you think as important. --Samuel di Curtisi di Salvadori 23:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
You mean Merge the characters and the important info(and my sources) into the main character page? Will do. - Prede (talk) 00:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Come to think of it, I'll do it tomorrow or the next day. Been really busy lately, thus me absense on Wikipedia. Just on to check watchlist really. Make sure those character pages are not deleted before I merge them. Thanks ^.^ - Prede (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Just got your message, Samuel. Chianti and Korn have appeared in a few episodes so far(425, 464, and in several episodes of the recently aired longest BO arc: 491-504) Therefore, their importance in the series may enhance over time, but as of currently, I don't mind the merge since their roles are limited. The only article I don't approve is Tequila (Case Closed) since he only appeared and died in one episode and has one or two flashback scenes. CH (talk) 19:43, 7 June 2008 (UTC)