User talk:Carsrac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A tag has been placed on Gebruiker:Carsrac, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason: Looks like a user page from Dutch Wikipedia Blanchardb (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- It was a quick action I did forget that user:Carsrac and nl:Gebruiker:Carsrac and Gebruiker:Carsrac are three pages. Thanks for the quick deleting of it.Carsrac (talk) 21:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Speedy removal
A tag has been placed on Phileas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Sting_au | Talk 23:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm in the progress of translating an dutch article. So it needs to be proofreaded and translated and proofreaded. If it deleted it can not be proofreaded. The sources are placed, maybe I should replace it in whole to the german or the simple english pages. I don't care. Let some one else do the cleaning up and filling the holes. If the english are not do it, the dutch people are going to do it. Carsrac (talk) 00:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- In reply to the message you left on my talk page....I placed the speedy delete template on your article mainly because it looks like nonesense to me. This may be due to use of poor English? An article on the English Wikipedia should be understandable by English speaking people. Perhaps a better translation of the original article source (which you also need to reference) is in order. In the mean time I'll leave the deletion tag there for an Admin to decide on. Sting_au | Talk 00:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
-
- I don't think you did read the article in the present form. Yes, for one second it was nosense, but that is the way I work. If you don't like it. Fine, but a work in progress is a work in progress. And if you don't understand it, please learn dutch and then we can discuss it in nobel language. Carsrac (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
I have discussed the speedy delete with the Admin who removed it. Have now placed cleanup, unreferenced and wikify tags on your article. That way editors who may be able to assist with this article can find it easier. Enjoy your editing on Wikipedia and I'm sure the article will eventually read much better. Cheers, Sting_au | Talk 00:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Interwikis bot
Could you please run interwikis bot from separate account? Will be good idea to assign bot status to this account. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Please Stop the Bot running and request a bot flag on ar.wiki. --74.85.13.52 (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
I have take the action in the suggested way. The bot name is CarsracBot. Carsrac (talk) 17:44, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] links added by bot
The bot added links to my user page [1] to accounts which are not mine. I reverted them.--Dakota Sandahl on a public computer 14:09, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
hi carsrac! i don't want to have interwiki links on my userpage, so i reverted your bot's edit. -- ∂ (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have stopped adding iw link on user pages. It was not a very good idea. Carsrac (talk) 16:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Botflag on vec
I think you should do the usual talk on the request page. From the three active voters 2 voted against because of the fact that in name computer there is no -bot part in. Carsrac (talk) 15:26, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
