User talk:CarlosPn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!
Dear CarlosPn: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:
Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.
One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 22:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Popes activities
Thank you for your informative notes on the pope. You might consider putting an edited version of what you left me (with paragraphs and maybe even subsections) on the discussion page on the article. There's a lot of information there.
I am unenthused about the article itself. Most popes listed did nothing wrong. Were married before Holy Orders, their spouses died. Were legally married since the early church saw nothing wrong with this for clerics. So the presence of all those names is absurd, in my opinion. The title is English was selected to titillate a readership, in itself a pov violation IMO.
Why is there no "sexual activities of the presidents of the US?" Or "Hollywood actors/actresses who cheated on their spouses?" One reason is that you can't come up with an article that isn't flattering to some other organization in society that Wikipedia admins will allow. Only Catholic targets are allowed. Very biased IMO.
But I will continue to edit and help where I can. Student7 (talk) 00:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Welcome to WikiProject Catholicism!
Hello, CarlosPn, and welcome to Wikiproject Catholicism! Thank you for your generous offer to help
contribute. I'm sure your input will be much appreciated. I hope you enjoy contributing here and being a Catholic Project Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to discuss anything on the project talk page, or to leave a message on my own talk page. Please remember to sign all your comments, and be bold with your edits. Again, welcome, and happy editing! --Thw1309 (talk) 16:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Kolobrzeg
Hi Carlos, according to Kolobrzeg, "The chronicle of Thietmar of Merseburg (975-1018) mentions the town as salsa Cholbergiensis as the seat of a bishop, Reinbern from Saxony (Hassegau): With the Congress of Gniezno in 1000, the Holy Roman Emperor Otto III granted the archdiocese of Gniezno the right to form a separate church hierarchy, with Kolberg as one of the dioceses." So I assumed it was still a diocese in 1220. Is this information incorrect? Adam Bishop (talk) 19:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! For Albenga I believe the source was Conrad Eubel, Hierarchia Catholica. I neglected to write down the source for every bishop, but generally, the names that are still in Latin are taken from Eubel. Eubel is a very old source and there may be better, more recent, sources, so if you find any mistakes, you are welcome to change them! Adam Bishop (talk) 13:00, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Good work!
Good work on those papal conclave articles! Its good to see someone else working in this relatively arcane field. Savidan 17:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] re: Papal conclave, 1667
I've added some in-text citations to my article Papal conclave, 1667. However, I left you to judge whether it's sufficient to remove the box "morefootnotes". The primary source for this article is the book of Valerie Pirie, "The Triple Cropwn: An account of the Papal Conclaves", which is available online. The list of patricipants and the informations about them are according to informations on the website The Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church by Salvador Miranda. CarlosPn (talk) February 19, 2008 20:54 (CET)
- Hello, CarlosPn. Thank you for your note and your quick referencing. I've removed the {{morefootnotes}} tag from the article. I'd suggest adding an actual reference for footnote #1, as the wikiarticle Papal conclave, 1621 does not exist yet. That article will need its own references, too, when it comes into existence. The same ref can be used in this article, right? Happy editing. :-) --PFHLai (talk) 05:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- BTW, I've nominated this article for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on February 18, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks. --PFHLai (talk) 06:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Papal conclave, 1667 DYK
 |
On 23 February 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papal conclave, 1667, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 07:21, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Papal conclave, 1534 DYK
|
On 26 February 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papal conclave, 1534, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 13:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
|
On February 27, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papal conclave, 1572, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Well done again Carlos. Do feel free to self nom in future. This was nommed by PFHLai. Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 01:03, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] nom
- ...that Gregory XIII the first pope canonised since the 13th century was elected by the Papal conclave of 1572? by CarlosPn OK? Victuallers (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Papal conclave, 1758
|
On 2 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papal conclave, 1758, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 10:32, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
|
On 8 March 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papal conclave, 1721, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Great job with the papal conclaves. 75 ballots is definitely an "interesting fact"! --Royalbroil 04:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] DYK
|
On 14 April 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Papal conclave, 1621, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Cirt (talk) 12:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Another cardinal-nephew?
What do you make of "Ludovico Migliorati" described as a cardinal-nephew in the article of Pope Innocent VII? Is he the same as the Giovanni Migliorati that we already have? If not, then the Cardinals of the Holy Roman Church site doesn't have him. But I have seen him listed in other sources, including The Catholic Encyclopedia and Papal Geneaology. What say you? Savidan 23:31, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Same for "CAETANI STEFANESCHI, Giacomo" described as a nephew by the Catholic Encyclopedia [1] but not by the Cardinals site [2]... Savidan 05:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Camerlengo of the Sacred College of Cardinals
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Camerlengo of the Sacred College of Cardinals, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.fiu.edu/~mirandas/camerlengos.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:23, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
