User talk:Carewolf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Infofacts 13:46, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Hi! Please read my text under 'discussion' regarding http://www.copenhagen.se , which is not a 'linkspam' but a link to a free information site about Copenhagen.

As far as I can tell, on the Social Conservatism page, not one of the pieces you removed from my intro could in any way be described as a 'weasel' word. It was basically sentence restructuring with the only noticible change in style/voice between my version and yours is your addition of a grammatical error or two. Please give me a legitimate reason you think my changes to the intro were somehow hostile, and I'll change them. Dreadloco 08:48, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Change of the Danish succession law

Has the change really been postponed? If so, this article (dated June 2006) confuses me: http://tvnz.co.nz/view/page/411366/738664 Why would the change be postponed if it has already been voted through one parliament?

It's the constitution. It requires approval by the current parliament, a parliamentary election, approval by the new parliament, and then a referendum with absolute majority (approval by 50% of elegible voters). The point is the last referendum, without a high awareness issue, like a newborn girl who can't inherit due to oldfashioned laws, its going to be difficult getting absolute majority.

Could you add some sources about this? I can't understand why the parliament would approve this change and then just forget about it. What has happened since June last year that makes them think that the change must be postponed? I need to read an article about this, otherwise I just don't believe it (Danish articles are OK, I'm Swedish).

Okay, there appears to have gone some odd politics into the issue. The end result is that the succession law have actually been approved as single point change for the constitution. And the laws for changing the constitution have been interpreted very liberally, meaning that the "next parliamentary election" will serve as the forced parliamentary election required for changing the constitution.

Official confirmation: http://www.folketinget.dk/?/Samling/20051/lovforslag/L1/som_vedtaget.htm

OK, thanks! Will there still be a referendum after the succession law gets voted through the next parliament?

Most likely, but that is officially for the next government to decide.

[edit] Image source problem with Image:BYvaaben.jpg

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:BYvaaben.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 19:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BYvaaben.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BYvaaben.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)