User talk:CardinalDan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Archive
Archives
/archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3


Contents

[edit] A few points about Hermetism

Firstly, it's not a good idea to describe the edits by an admin as having been vandalism. It isn't a good idea to describe any edits as vandalism unless they're obviously bad-faith.

Secondly, Hall really isn't a reliable source. That's why the stuff was removed.

Okay? DS (talk) 18:39, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Yeah, I think I made a mistake on that. I Apologise. CardinalDan (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
I've removed your access to Twinkle for the period of one week, due to the misuse as detailed by DS. Please spend time during the next week familiarising yourself with the applicable policies to reverting vandalism, such as WP:VANDAL. Nick (talk) 18:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Well, it was my mistake, but I think a week removal of access is a bit harsh. It was just one mistake I made. Otherwise, I haven't abused Twinkle at all. I think maybe 3 days penalty is more than enough. CardinalDan (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Ok, I've reprotected your monobook for 24 hours. After that time you can put twinkle back in. But please be careful. The "identified as vandalism" bit did not feel nice :) Best, Moreschi (talk) (debate) 18:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


I deeply apolgize for that. I was being careless about my RC patrolling. I think a day penalty is what I deserve for being careless. CardinalDan (talk) 18:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes I agree as well.--98.207.192.104 (talk) 03:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page... Cheers! κaτaʟavenoTC 02:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:207.32.195.246

Technically, no rules are being broken if he blanks the warnings. It's sort of allowed now. HalfShadow 03:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

  • OK, but is there some way I can tell the individual who blanks the talk page that their warnings are still valid?? CardinalDan (talk) 03:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't believe there's any real need to; the warnings are still 'there', even if they've been blanked. They still count, they're just not showing anymore. By definition, the fact that they've been blanked means the person who blanked them has read them. HalfShadow 03:57, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    • So, is it possible that I could write something to the effect that since they blanked their warning, they acknowledge that they know and accept their warning??? CardinalDan (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
If you wanted to, sure, I suppose. Of course there's the fact that, as a random IP, your message may not be going to the same person. HalfShadow 16:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank You for removing vandalism from my page --Megapen (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Killed By 9V Batteries

The band is notable among the Austrian scene. Besides I have numerous sources to prove its legitimacy.--SilverOrion (talk) 03:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

  • OK, I admit fault with that, but if possible, can you expand the article a but? From the way it was written, it seemed like a advertisment about a band. CardinalDan (talk) 04:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)