User talk:Caraski
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] World Financial Group
I have reverted your recent additions to the WFG article, as it was unsourced. Given the hotbed of propaganda, both pro and con, that the article has attracted, it's important that any such material be well-sourced. Specific problems with your edit's references were:
- The first reference was blank
- The second reference (a law firm) did not link to the alleged case information, and my cursory examination did not turn up such information
- The third reference, as a personal website, does not constitute a reliable source.
Properly sourced, there's no reason this content can't be included in the article -- but proper sourcing (newspapers and the like) is paramount. — Lomn 03:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
