Talk:Carly Pope

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed biographical guide to actors and filmmakers on Wikipedia.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Carly Pope article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

[edit] carly-pope.com deletion

Mathew, what's the point to deleting the caly-pope.com site reference? The site owner is in constant contact with her agent and Carly herself. Csylcox 14:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a database of links, see WP:EL. I do find it odd that a new account would just show up moments after another account, which had mostly been used just to edit this article, to re-add that link. Being in contact with the actress does not make the site any more reputable, there are many fansites that are in contact with the person they're a fan of. Matthew 14:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

"Such pages could contain further research that is accurate and on-topic; information that could not be added to the article for reasons such as copyright or amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks); or other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article for reasons unrelated to their reliability (such as reviews and interviews)." "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons." Granted, some of the other links might not be suitable, but carly-pope.com is. What you also find odd is irrelevant to this topic, but my account is not new.Csylcox 14:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

This site does not comply with external link guidelines, as it mostly consists of copyright violations, and as such should not be linked per WP:EL#Restrictions on linking. dissolve^talk 02:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

cp.com was used as a huge reference for this pagePezzy (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

That may be true, but a self-published website is not considered a reliable source, see WP:BLP#Sources. The article needs to be referenced with verifiable reliable sources to meet Wikipedia core content policies of WP:Verifiability and WP:No Original Research. dissolve^talk 20:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

the other site you left as a reliable reference also referenced cp.com. what does that tell you????? Pezzy (talk) 21:55, 30 April 2008 (UTC)