Talk:Carlingford railway line, Sydney
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Carlingford railway line, Sydney is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list |
 |
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) |
| Low | This article has been rated as low-importance within the Trains WikiProject. |
 |
This article needs a map. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article. Once the requested map is added, remove the Mapneeded parameter from the {{TrainsWikiProject}} template call on this page to remove this map request. |
Is the platform at Rose Hill really sixteen cars long? It seems unlikely because CityRail doesn't usually operate Electric Multiple Unit rolling stock longer than 8 cars... Techelf 10:09, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Great work on this article! --Alexxx1 07:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Carlo line
I use the Carlingford line twice a week, and since they upgraded the track between Carlingford and Telopea the ride is much smoother but after Telopea it seems as tho the track moves under the train due to the age of the wooden sleepers, while cornering the train bumps around heaps and it feels unsafe, even in the Millennium train. I even submitted ideas to connect the existing Carlingford To Epping by tunnelling at the end of the line where the un-used track remains from the old days and going to epping from there. But then i remembered that the parramatta road crossing holds up traffic, So then i said to city rail How about tunnelling from granville or parramatta going under parramatta road then re surfacing just before rosehill. If you support my idea you should let city rail know thats its a good idea that will keep the heritage of the line in mind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tezza27 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
