Talk:Carl Baugh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mr Carl Baugh has a talk page! Dunc|☺ 21:47, 23 September 2005 (UTC) I would like to know a lot more about his proclamations and why they are considered false in the scientific world. Just knowing that someone said he's wrong doesn't give me satisfaction, evidence makes all the difference.
Duncharris, Baugh's claims are clearly pseudoscience, just like alchemy and astrology. skiddum 12:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)skiddum
[edit] Removed reference
I removed a reference to my website for privacy reasons. skiddum 12:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)skiddum
[edit] Question
Is there any available picture of these "tracks"? Finite 02:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
````http://www.bible.ca/tracks/tracks.htm
[edit] NPoV
There's significant unremovable content in this article that violates the Neutral Point of View rules here.
RWAnderson72 03:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia!
Yoda921 14:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Yoda
The human footprints are verifiable. I have been to the dig site and seen them myself. To claim that they are known to be false is obviously someone stating his/her opinion. That opinion is based upon a world view which believes that evolution is true and that creation is not. This article is not treating the subject fairly.
````Kathy1510
To Kathy1510: LMAO! sincerely, skiddum 12:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)skiddum