Talk:Careless Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Careless Love article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Songs because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProjectSongs}} template, removing the {{Stubclass}} template from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article. WikiProject Songs (Rated Stub-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. WikiProject Roots, Folk, and Traditional music     (Rated Stub-Class) Music Portal Careless Love is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide on Wikipedia to roots music, folk music and traditional music. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familier with the guidelines. Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the Project's quality scale.

I'm sorry that Cutchullian chose to remove the phrase

" you can pass my gate, you can pass my door, but you can't get past this fourty-four."

which I included to give a taste of the song.

It is found in several forms in quite a few versions. I will not put it back for fear of upsetting him. Maybe he can find a full representative version of the lyric to include.

What is the evidence that Buddy Bolden used the tune ? 82.47.176.254 22:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)mikeL

I only removed it because it doesn't appear in all versions. As for a full version of the lyrics, Wikipedia doesn't generally do that, though there is a sister project called Wikisource that does. I don't know the evidence for Buddy Bolden using it, I didn't put it in, but a quick Google search reveals he seems to be associated with it.--Cúchullain ^t/c 00:04, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

A good number of musicians and some music going regulars with first hand memories of Bolden were on record as saying it was one of the standards of the Bolden repertory. I know its appeared in print a few times but would have to check for which books. -- Infrogmation 00:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

I suggest for the lyics just include versions from 1922 or before, so as to be sure they have no copyright problems. -- Infrogmation 00:16, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the big improvement Ortolan88 82.47.176.254 15:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)mikeL

Would it be considered appropriate to include the lyrics used by Johnny Cash and Bob Dylan, since they are widely available and one of the more famous versions of the song? They also include the "fourty-four" line, along with a good deal of other firearms references, including one to a thirty-ought-six that I have just found misquoted all over the Internet as "thirty-old-six"--whatever that might mean. Akulaalfa 21:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Those more recent recordings are presumably not public domain. Mentioning significant variations would probably be okay, but don't reproduce anything in full or substantial part if it is still under copyright. -- Infrogmation 01:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)