User talk:Capitalist Shrugged

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] May 2008

Welcome!

Hello, Capitalist Shrugged, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Enuja (talk) 22:51, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Manny Santos

Welcome to Wikipedia! Your recent edits to Manny Santos have been reverted as the information you added to the article is incorrect. Please remember to use sources to back up your claims. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 17:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Manny Santos has been reverted. Please do not remove content from pages without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Wisdom89 (T / C) 17:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Manny Santos. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ukexpat (talk) 17:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

It is clear that you are engaged in an edit war or some other dispute with other editors of this article. Synopses of episodes do not require references, they are what they are. If they require changes, please make them if they are minor, or discuss them first on the article talk page if they are major. Wholesale deletion of large portions of text without discussion and consensus is vandalism. – ukexpat (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
I requested the user to provide a source for this edit because I knew that the information was false and a proper, valid source would not be found. User:Capitalist Shrugged then attempted to add a source to a different, already-existing portion of Manny Santos, which (I agree with you User:Ukexpat) was unnecessary. Just thought I'd point that out. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 18:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Manny Santos, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please stop adding incorrect information to Manny Santos. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 18:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] your userpage

In response to the animal farm reference; yes, we do have a rule. it goes something like "all animals are equal, but animals who's sole contribution is vandalising the same page over and over designed to be told where to go". If you dont think you're given respect or treated right, stop vandalising and actually contribute. Ironholds 18:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button Image:Signature_icon.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires.  :-) Stwalkerster [ talk ] 19:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

It appears that "vandalism" seems to be one of those throw around terms here, like the way politicians use the term "terrorism". Could someone explain what I'm doing wrong instead of this overly vague one word answer "vandalism"? I contribute just like other members and I get blocked. Why? Just explain that. Remember, don't use the term "vandalism".Capitalist Shrugged (talk) 19:28, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism has a very specific definition, see WP:VAND for more information. I have blocked you for an additional week for this edit, which appears to be vandalism. If you have any questions, or wish to contest this block, put

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Because the character in the show got molested by her father and ended up moving out, that's why I put it in. Are you familiar with Degrassi? They touch on controversial topics that teenagers go through, such a pregnancy, abortion, drugs, infidelity, etc. I'm not sure why it "appears" to be vandalism. Am I deliberately trying to compromise the "integrity" of wikipedia by putting in factual information? I don't think so."

Decline reason: "As you can see, other users disagree with the facts you're adding. You reacted by edit-warring, which is not how we deal with disagreements on Wikipedia. When your block expires, just discuss on the talk page why your facts are accurate, keeping your comments simple, polite, and clear, and including a reliable source that others can use to verify the facts, like an article about the show that discusses it. Seek consensus from the others working on the article regarding what the most accurate and useful information is. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:51, 2 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Just thought I'd mention that none of the articles you edited (Craig Manning, Ellie Nash, or Manny Santos) were about characters that got molested in the Degrassi series. That information was incorrect and removed, yet you continued to re-add it, claiming that you're not doing anything wrong. You also stated that Manny got AIDS, which is also false. I suggest you watch the series again, paying close attention to what happens and to whom, before adding false information to Wikipedia articles. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 15:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
She got aids from craig. Capitalist Shrugged (talk) 15:48, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Again, false. That never happened. Like I said before, please re-watch the episodes. - k|e|n|g - t | c - 15:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)