User talk:Cape cod naturalist

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please leave a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, Cape cod naturalist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Khalidkhoso 02:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Willard T. Sears article

Hi Cape cod naturalist, great to finally see an article on Willard T. Sears. Thanks! 19:17, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi UTC, you're welcome, that was fun. Can you perhaps help clean up the question of who designed the Pilgrim Monument? All local contemporary pop literature sources I have refer to it as being designed by Sears with no mention of Charles Amos Cummings. However, the Cummings page here seems to claim the Monument for him with little mention of Sears's involvement. Sears was a descendant of the Mayflower, I have heard, and that might make it likely that he'd be involved.Cape cod naturalist 20:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Excellent contribution

Provincetown Harbor looks like a FA candidate to me. Great job! Jerry lavoie 04:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you much.Peter 04:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: thank you

No problem, glad I could help! --Nevhood 03:40, 4 March 2007 (UTC)



[edit] Pilgrim monument

I've dug up a couple old sources with pictures of a different Pilgrim Monument in Plymouth (e.g. [1]). It seems like this one no longer exists? Just wondering if you knew anything.... -- Kendrick7talk 18:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you much for the digging. I didn't know about that monument so I did some digging, too. It appears to still be there in Plymouth albeit under a new name: National Monument to the Forefathers Perhaps they changed the name to avoid confusion with the one in Provincetown? Peter 03:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
There is a wikipedia page on this. Perhaps there should be a disambiguation page to distinguish the two monuments? Just a thought...Peter 03:45, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, OK -- that's the one in the pic I saw. I was just confused since I was looking at sources from the 1890s. Yeah, maybe I should go ahead and disambig them. I thought it was weird when I google'd "Pilgrim Monument" and one of the first hits was an editorial saying "it's not in Plymouth" when I'm looking at a source that clearly says it is in Plymouth. Maybe just a dab/distinguish link would do the trick.... -- Kendrick7talk 04:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
OK, I dab'd it. Thanks for figuring this out. Go sox : ) -- Kendrick7talk 04:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:Vorse.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vorse.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Charles Egan Gallery

Hi,

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, however, please be aware of an essential rule. Edits to Wikipedia may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. Entries that do not comply with this rule must be removed.

Useful Links

Feel free to contact me personally with any questions you might have. My Talk Page Wikipedia:About, Wikipedia:Help desk, and Wikipedia:Village pump are also a place to go for answers to general questions. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~. Toddstreat1 01:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:EvelynScottEscapade.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EvelynScottEscapade.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:18, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Center Methodist Church steeple.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Center Methodist Church steeple.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Center_Methodist_Church_design.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Center_Methodist_Church_design.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] US Post Office-Provincetown Main

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article US Post Office-Provincetown Main, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of US Post Office-Provincetown Main. Dr Gangrene (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)