Talk:Capitol View/Stifft's Station

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

This article is part of WikiProject Arkansas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Arkansas.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is of low-importance within WikiProject Arkansas.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Capitol View/Stifft's Station article.

Article policies

[edit] Page Created

Okay. I am going to fix the disambiguation links and upload some pictures of my own once I figure out how to license them or release them into the public domain or whatever and what templates and code to use and whether or not to upload them to wikimedia commons and how exactly to go about doing that and all that jazz. I also want this to be included in Wikiproject:Arkansas and need to figure out how to do that and a ton of other things, but it will get done. I had to call all over town to get the proper boundaries and I still don't know the date CV/SS was annexed into the city. All in due course, though. Broooooooce (talk) 18:14, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow, awesome job! I just expanded the two NRHP infoboxes in the article. If you don't like the map that is included in one of them, it can be removed by deleting the coordinates info within the infobox. I used what is refered to as the "Elkman NRHP infobox generator", which you might use for other articles. Try it, at http://www2.elkman.net/nrhp/infobox.php. doncram (talk) 20:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, I made the infoboxes match one another, both using the maps and fixed it where the coordinates did not override the coord title template already used at the top of the article. I also rearranged the pictures to be more astheticly pleasing with regard to the new bigger boxes. Now if I could just get someone to assess this thing. Broooooooce (talk) 22:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Assessment

I'm bumping up to B. Length, photos and references merit it, imho. :) --Ebyabe (talk) 19:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)