Talk:Capilano Suspension Bridge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Vancouver Portal
This article is part of WikiProject Vancouver, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area. To participate, edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
If you have rated this article please consider adding assessment comments.
Thumb
 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges, a WikiProject which aims to expand coverage of bridges on Wikipedia. Please feel free to join us.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
Map needed
 It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in British Columbia may be able to help!

Contents

[edit] Bridge Incident

Someone should include the incident circa 2000 when a baby fell from the bridge onto the bank of the river. I'd do it, but I don't recall enough information about it. - Hinto 18:37, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

We work at Capilano Suspension Bridge, and we disagree. We don't think that that information belongs on this page because it doesn't explain about the beauty of our park. The park is a marvolous place for people of all ages, and the bridge is completely safe. We hope to see you at the bridge in the near future!
Above was posted by 64.85.54.101 21:01, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a promotion guide or advertisement space; encyclopedias contain facts. It's a fact that such event did happen on this bridge, and so, belongs in this article if one were to happen to add the information. It is also a fact that 800,000 people visit the park each year and (as far as I know) no one else has died, showing that the bridge is safe. Such information could be added too. Zhatt 22:26, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

We are not using this page as a promotion. We just don't want this one event to poison our page that time was spent on. Unless you can find an exact date and every detail about this event, please do not write about it.
Above was posted by 64.85.54.101 00:41, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

I noticed that you are being quite NPOV with the information you are adding and I applaud that. I also don't know the exact details about the event in question and therefore, am not writing about it. I'm just warning that if such information is added by another user, it can not simply be dismissed because it detracts from the "beauty" of the park. On another note it would be useful to create an account and to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks, Zhatt 02:00, September 3, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] POV and accuracy concerns

As silly as it sounds, this article is riddled with opinionated POV. Sources for death and near-death incidents need to be cited as well. 69.236.184.108 09:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

I had asked the original author of those additions to cite a source and has recently done so. I have also personally checked the facts and added some of my own along with sources. The incident involving the suicide is still up in the air. Zhatt 20:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

I am the original author of the incidents section. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any direct references to the suicide incident. Again, because it was a suicide and not reported on major media it is difficult to find. Therefore, the only way tht I can see this getting backed up would be to: 1) Have a copy of the death certificate for the individual in question, 2) provide a copy of the police report surrounding this incident. I am not sure on what steps are involved, and I imagine that this isn't information that is given out readily. Abu sme 07:18, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

I've done a pass with NPOV in mind - hopefully it'll help. The figures are now metric, although it could probably use some fact-checking to verify dates and numbers. --Ckatz 09:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] images

theres too many, the formatting is ugly, i propose we pick the best for the opening paragrapgh, maybe one more in the body (small) and most importantly put in a photogallery! anyone up for it?T ALK•QRC2006•¢ʘñ†®¡ß§ 00:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Capbridgelogo.jpg

Image:Capbridgelogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:17, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Capbridgelogo.jpg

Image:Capbridgelogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)