User talk:Cantikadam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User talk:Cantikadam


Welcome!

Hello, Cantikadam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Bertilvidet 15:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)


Contents

[edit] Care to comment?

There is a discussion on Roles of non-combatant State and non-State actors in the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict talkpage about the inclusion of detail for Israel. I am of the view that Israel should be included but the detail is being continually removed by User:Tewfik.

Tewfik's argument is what he considers the illegality of Hezbollah under UN 1559. How this has a bearing on a balanced representation of aid to the combatants is never made clear. Tewfik has not removed recent requests of arms sales to Israel such as jet fuel and GBU-28's but removed the history of such arms shipments. I believe he is pushing the POV that aid to Israel is only in response to the current crisis or the illegality of Hezbollah under 1559. US aid to Israel is in fact a long standing agreement responsible for the size and makeup of the IDF. Without the aid they would not have a military capable of engaging in conflict. This is a question of balance in the article and if you can take a look and support my position (was working under 82.29.227.171) that would be great. RandomGalen 17:32, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your comments on Talk:Freemasonry

I rv'ed your comments as being nothing but disruptive. At best, I think that you're under a few misconceptions, which I don't think I'd be able to clear up if I tried.. Now, I honestly don't know how Masonry works in Turkey, but I do know Masons from Turkey, and I think you're exaggerating just a little bit. Where you got that Victorian claim is beyond me; at that point you're spinning wild theories that have no basis in fact. Wikipedia is not a soapbox or a blog, so if you're not going to be able to make constructive comments on the Freemasonry article, then simply stay away from it. MSJapan 15:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Freemasonry

On my talk page you ask:

Why are you so interested in freemasonary? (cantikadam 14:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC))

Because it is a facinating topic. And I can tell you that you are very mistaken about how Freemasonry works and what it is. So please, get off of your POV soap box, and stop disrupting the article's talk page. Blueboar 17:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Armenians and Kurds...

Hi Cantikadam, I'm not sure what you want to know about my thoughts on these subjects. I think it is all very clear (but if not you can read all the materials I have put on the web about the genocide on my own wiki website, Armeniapedia.org). Basically, the Turkish governments have historically treated Armenians as a whole as second class citizens and over history tried to Turkify them. That is why when I look at your picture, you really look almost exactly like me - our resemblance is startling. This did not happen by accident, the Turkic tribes that came from Central Asia looked nothing like you... for 1,000 years they kidnapped Armenian women and forced Armenians into Islam and to speak Turkish. It is simple fact. In 1915, they decided once and for all that the threat, whether real or percieved that Armenia would follow in the footsteps of Greece, Serbia, etc was too great - and they wanted desperately to connect their country to the other Turkic tribes from Azerbaijan to Turkmenistan. It was a dream that the Armenian people were in the middle of, and they got rid of them. The slaughter was systemic, government run, and spared nobody. Men were collected for forced labor and murdered. Women, children and elderly were gathered and escorted by Turkish troops into the desert. To call this a relocation like the Turkish government likes to claim today is a spitting insult on the victims. They were not allowed to take things along, they were not provided food, water or shelter, they were often not allowed to drink even if they came upon water, they were being massacred, robbed and raped all along the way, by Turkish soldiers and others as well. If they somehow survived all this, their final destination was not a new home, not even a tent, it was the desert. So what actually happened is very clear. Yes, the Armenians in Istanbul were for the most part scared, yes it might have been "only" 1 million, rather than 1.5 millions, but no, there is absolutely without a doubt that the Ottoman Turkish government ordered, knowning fully what the result would be, all of these actions in order to "liquidate" the Armenian race from Anatolia. It is that simple. All of these reasons are very obvious, they are very clear, and no, they are not fun for me to think about, as I imagine they are not for you either. But the hyper-nationalist mentality in Turkey, and the successive governments who have tried to avoid blame/punishment have done Turkey a huge disservice. Today, instead of being respectable like Germany, the Turkish name is still marred. Instead of having good relations with Armenia and using it as a friend and bridge, it is being blockaded and ignored. It is all a true shame... I see slow change (yes, I know for Turkey these changes are very fast, but for us on the outside, watching, waiting, seeing the last survivors of the genocide dying) it is very slow... Eh, anyway... that's enough of my thoughts for now... ciao, --RaffiKojian 04:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

If you see nothing wrong with Turks arriving in Armenia and trying to Turkify the Armenians, and finally just killing off those who they had failed on, and you're going to repeat the same old lame arguement that if some government officials were Armenian, then there could not have been discrimination against Armenians, why did you bother write me a note? Why are you wasting both of our time? Go and read the Armenian Genocide article again and again until you see that it is not propaganda, it is all verifiable research - or else you are so blinded by your governments revisionism that you can't see straight. And yes, the "great" powers used and abused many nations, that does not justify a genocide. --RaffiKojian 18:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Freemasonry

I reverted everything you added to the Talk page. You do realize the things you're talking about happened almost two years ago? Drop it and move on. MSJapan (talk) 13:18, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Can I help you?

Hi there - I see you asked me a rather oblique question on my talk page, and I assume this is in relation to the recent exchanges on the talk page of Freemasonry. I can see you are a serious and committed person, so I ask you if there is anything I can do for you? docboat (talk) 02:07, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

No, thank you. D.Rockefeller's declarations should be studied on. What do you think for his speeches as a Mason?. (cantikadam (talk) 08:19, 3 June 2008 (UTC)).
What are you on about? Is there any way I can help you? Is there a serious question here?? docboat (talk) 10:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)