Talk:Candy Manson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Speedy delete
The nominator claims this is a repost of deleted material. It appears to have been built up by gradual editing. Article appears to be sufficiently-sourced and notability sufficiently established to pass AfD process. Nominator has been involved in contentious mass-WP:POINT-AfDs apparently resulting from a Speedy Delete of an article he was attached to. Dekkappai 18:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Dekkappai always writes the same thing at every porn star AfD even though notabilty is never displayed in the articles. Epbr123 18:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- I concur with Dekkappai. The actress is at least notable enough for an AfD, and would most likely be kept there. Either way, speedy is not appropriate. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 18:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy is appropriate as it was previously deleted. Fact. Epbr123 18:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
I removed the speedy acting as an admin; don't restore it. The nomination for best new actress is an assertion of notability, and new since the last AfD, the situation has changed enough that it doesn't qualify as speedy delete as a repost. Feel free to re-nominate for AfD, of course, but I've found a fair number of interviews and articles about her on the Web, will add. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 19:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC) I also agree. she is notable for the fact that she was nominated at the 2007 avn....best new starlet. I am the originator of her page. it was a work in progress.mjh 21:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD history
This article was AfD'd at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Manson on, 3 September 2006, then recreated, expanded, and survived AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Manson (2nd nomination) 22 March 2007. (Feel free to replace this line with nifty templates!) --AnonEMouse (squeak) 21:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. Valrith 21:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)