Talk:Canadian Unitarian Council

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Organizations. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Canada Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.   Religion Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details. B This article has been rated as B on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) This article falls within the scope of the Unitarian Universalism work group. If you are interested in Unitarian Universalism-related topics, please visit the project page to see how you can help.

User:Jdlh wrote:

Brighterorange: I'm interested to know your thoughts on the Canadian Unitarian Council article. In Sept 2005, you tagged it for {{cleanup}}, with a comment of "yikes". But there's no comments in the Discussion page about what specifically should be cleaned up. What caught your eye?

Well, what bothered me about the article is that it mainly consists of large quoted texts "reproduced with permission." An encyclopedia article should be written from a neutral point of view (and thus not say things like "... our religious faith..."). Also, it has almost no wiki links. That's what I had in mind; sorry for not being more specific when I added the tag. Brighterorange 17:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)