Canon EF-S 17-55mm lens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM

Key features
Maker: Canon
Image stabilization: Yes Yes
Ultrasonic motor: Yes Yes
Short back focus: Yes Yes
Macro capable: No No
Application: Standard
Technical data
Type: Special
Focal length: 17-55mm (35 mm equivalent of 27-88mm)
Aperture (max/min): f/2.8 – f/22
Construction: 12 groups / 19 elements
# Diaphragm blades: 7
Close focus distance: 0.35 m (1.15 ft)
Max. magnification: 0.17
Physical
Max. diameter: 83.5 mm (3.3 in)
Max. length: 110.6 mm (4.4 in)
Weight: 645 g
Filter diameter: 77 mm
Accessories
Lens hood: EW-83J, optional
Case: LP1219, optional
Angle of view
Horizontal: 68° 40' – 23° 20'
Vertical: 48° – 15° 40'
Diagonal: 78° 30' – 27° 50'
History
Introduced: 2006
Retail info
MSRP US$ $1,179

The Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM is a high-quality standard zoom lens for Canon digital single-lens reflex cameras with an EF-S lens mount. The field of view has a 35 mm equivalent focal length of 27-88mm.

Contents

[edit] Reception

[edit] Praise

It is praised as "one of the best general/multi-purpose lenses available",[1][2] and ideal for available light photography on a Canon APS-C camera.[3]

The fast f/2.8 aperture, combined with 3-stop Image Stabilization, makes the 17-55 much faster (5 stops) than an un-stabilized f/3.5–5.6 Canon EF-S 18-55mm lens, which is a frequent kit lens, and thus the 17-55 is much more suited for hand-holding and available light photography, and it is a practical event photography lens.

[edit] Criticisms

This lens is widely regarded as being prone to flare when used without a hood,[2] and especially with low-quality UV filters.

The 17-55 suffers from vignetting at f/2.8 of 0.5-1 EV throughout the focal range.[4][3]

Chromatic aberration is a relative weakness at the wide end (at the edges and corners),[3] but is quite low for a zoom in this range.[4]

Some[5] but not all[2] users have reported the lens gathering a lot of dust inside of it, a problem that Canon has apparently acknowledged.

[edit] Quality

The 17-55 is not an L-series lens, but it has some UD (ultra-low dispersion) lens elements, which are largely reserved for L-series lenses, and some say that the 17-55 has comparable image quality to L-series lenses.[4][6] Some regard the decision to not designate the lens as L-class as marketing-driven.[4]

"The resolution figures are among the very best seen so far for an APS-C standard zoom lens."[4]

The build quality is inferior to L-series lenses (plastic body, not magnesium alloy), though superior to the EF-S 17-85mm.

[edit] Similar lenses

As a general purpose EF-S zoom lens, the alternatives to the 17-55 are the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6, which is a cheaper kit lens, and the EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, which is midway between the 18-55 and 17-55 in some respects—depending on which version of the 18-55 one is comparing—and boasts a longer telephoto end.

The 17-55 is at times compared to the EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, which has similar image quality (despite the latter being L series and the 17-55 not being so designated), and is cheaper, though the 17-55's faster aperture and IS make it more suited (by 4 stops) for hand-holding and available light photography.

The EF 28-90mm is an inexpensive kit lens and is not comparable to the 17-55, having slower aperture, lower image quality, and no image stabilization.

[edit] Notes and References

  1. ^ Greenspun, Philip. Canon EF-S 17-55/2.8 IS USM Review. photo.net. Retrieved on 2008-02-25.
  2. ^ a b c Carnathan, Bryan. Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens Review. The-Digital-Picture.com. Retrieved on 2008-02-25.
  3. ^ a b c Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM. SLRgear.com. Retrieved on 2008-02-25.
  4. ^ a b c d e Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 USM IS - Test Report / Review. photozone. Retrieved on 2008-02-25.
  5. ^ Canon EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM. fredmiranda.com Post of 2007 October 18 by Anjo Francke reports dust from early use; post of 2008 Jan 12 by Cipi reports no dust after heavy use in dusty climates.. Retrieved on 2008-02-25.
  6. ^ "My 17-55 matches or exceeds the optical performance of my L-Series zooms in this similar focal length range", The-Digital-Photo.com

[edit] External links