Talk:CambridgeSoft
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. | |
| Stub | rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale. | |
[edit] Notability
I really don't see what the problem is here. The article clearly states what the company is notable for, and it appears to be accurate.
Almost 4 million Google hits, and while the first page are mainly their own sites, it says something that their own sites are top of that long a list. Other sites listed seem quite adequate to establish that this is a notable organisation, and that ChemDraw in particular is a notable product, and even if they went bust tomorrow (I have no reason to suspect they will, that's an even if) they'd remain notable purely for the contribution they have made to chemical engineering software (and possibly for other reasons as well but that's enough).
It would be good to expand the stub like all stubs, but I don't think this (inaccurate) notice helps at all. Comments welcome, and in the absence of any I'll remove the notice in a few days. Andrewa 15:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion
See Talk:ChemDraw. Andrewa 21:03, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
