Campaign finance

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Globe icon
 The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.
Please improve this article or discuss the issue on the talk page.


Political campaign
Part of the Politics series
  • Campaign finance
Grassroots fundraising
Opposition research
Political consulting
  • Campaign message
Campaign advertising
Canvassing
Election promise
Get out the vote
Lawn signs
Negative campaigning
Attack ad
Fear mongering
Push poll
Smear campaign
Voter suppression
  • Key people
Candidate
Campaign manager
Political campaign staff
Politics Portal
This box: view • talk • edit

Campaign finance refers to the means by which money is raised for election campaigns. As campaigns have many expenditures, ranging from the cost of travel for the candidate and others to the purchasing of air time for TV advertisements, candidates often spend a great deal of time and effort raising money to finance their cause.

Although the political science literature indicates that most contributors give to support candidates with whom they are already in agreement,[1] it is widely believed that donors expect something in return (such as specific legislation being enacted or defeated) so some have come to equate campaign finance with political corruption and bribery. These views have led some governments to reform fundraising sources and techniques in the hope of eliminating perceived undue influence being given to monied interests. Another tactic is for the government, rather than private interests, to provide funding for campaigns.

Democratic countries have differing views on what is legal and what types of donations to political parties and campaigns are acceptable.

Several disciplines, such as economics, public policy, public choice theory, and collective action theory attempt to understand the dynamics of the political processes.

Contents

[edit] Private financing

Some democracies rely heavily on private donors to bankroll political campaigns. In these countries, fundraising is often a significant activity for the campaign staff and the candidate, especially in larger and more prominent campaigns. For example, one unscientific survey in the United States found that 23% of candidates for statewide office surveyed spent more than half of their scheduled time raising money, and over half of all candidates surveyed spent at least 1/4 of their time on fundraising.[2]. The tactics used can include direct mail solicitation, attempts to encourage supporters to contribute via the Internet, direct solicitation from the candidate, and high-priced events specifically for the purpose of fundraising, or other activities

Most countries that rely on private donations to fund campaigns require extensive disclosure of donations, frequently including information such as the name, employer and address of donors. This is intended to allow for policing of undue donor influence by other campaigns or by good government groups, while preserving the benefits of private financing, including the right to make donations and to spend money for political speech, and allowing the government to save the expense of funding political speech which some citizens may find odious (see [2]). Supporters of private financing systems believe that, in addition to avoiding government limitations on speech, they foster civic involvement and ensure that a diversity of views are heard.

[edit] Public financing

Other countries choose to use government funding to run campaigns. The mechanisms for this can be quite varied, ranging from direct subsidy of political parties to government matching funds for certain types of private donations (often small donations) and many other systems as well. Supporters of public financing generally believe that the public financing system decreases corruption; in addition, many proponents believe that public financing promotes other values, such as civic participation or greater faith in the political process. Not all public financing is delivered in the form of money; some systems require campaign materials (often air time on television) to be provided at very low rates to the candidates. Critics sometimes complain of the expense of the public financing systems. Libertarian critics of the system argue that government should not subsidize political speech. Other critics argue that public financing, with its emphasis on equalizing money resources, merely exaggerates differences in non-monetary resources.

In many countries, such as Germany and the United States, campaigns can be funded by a combination of private and public money. Local cities in the United States, such as Chapel Hill, North Carolina, have also considered whether to publicly finance local elections.[3]

[edit] See also

[edit] References

  1. ^ [1]
  2. ^ Begging for Bucks. Campaigns and Elections. Retrieved on 2007-03-12.
  3. ^ "Publicly financed election", Raleigh News and Observer OrangeChat blog, 2008-05-14. Retrieved on 2008-05-18. 

Ansolabehere, Stephen; John de Figueiredo, James M. Snyder, Jr. (2003). "Why Is There So Little Money in U.S. politics?" (PDF). Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (1): 105-130. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  Will, George. "'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' Hypocrisy", The Washington Post, 2005-12-11. Retrieved on 2007-03-12. 

[edit] Further reading

[edit] External links

Languages