Caminetti v. United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Caminetti v. United States | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supreme Court of the United States | ||||||||||||
Argued November 13-14, 1916 Decided January 15, 1917 |
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Holding | ||||||||||||
Court membership | ||||||||||||
Chief Justice: Edward Douglass White Associate Justices: Joseph McKenna, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., William R. Day, Willis Van Devanter, Mahlon Pitney, James Clark McReynolds, Louis Brandeis, John Hessin Clarke |
||||||||||||
Case opinions | ||||||||||||
Majority by: Day Joined by: Holmes, Hughes, Van Devanter, Lamar, Pitney Dissent by: McKenna Joined by: Clarke, White McReynolds took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
||||||||||||
Laws applied | ||||||||||||
White-Slave Traffic (Mann) Act, ch. 395, 36 Stat. 825 (1910) (codified as amended at 18 U.S.C. ยงยง 2421-2424). |
Caminetti v. United States, 242 U.S. 470 (1917), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case involving the Mann Act. The Court decided that the Mann Act applied not only to purposes of prostitution but also to other noncommercial consensual sexual liaisons. Thus, consensual extramarital sex falls within the genre of "immoral sex."
The case was historic in that it was one of the first where the court embraced the idea of the Plain Meaning Rule, where if the language of the statute is plain, the courts must enforce it, literally, according to its terms.
[edit] See also
[edit] External links
This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.