User talk:CalgaryWikifan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello CalgaryWikifan, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! We can always use more Calgarians here! -- JamesTeterenko 17:51, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] You got it right

If you were wondering if you left a message properly, then don't worry. I got your message. Have fun in Wikipedia! -- JamesTeterenko 20:14, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Welcome to the Wiki, fellow Calgarian! - Dr Haggis - Talk 22:50, 28 July 2005 (UTC)


[edit] User Categorisation

You were listed on the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Canada page as living in or being associated with Alberta. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Alberta for instructions.--Rmky87 00:15, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Alberta-chinook.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Alberta-chinook.gif. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much.

[edit] Image source/licensing for Image:2003-fw-globalfest.JPG

The image you uploaded, Image:2003-fw-globalfest.JPG, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:20, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Image source/licensing for Image:Alberta-chinook.gif

The image you uploaded, Image:Alberta-chinook.gif, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fort McMurray

You recently changed the introduction paragraph on the Fort McMurray, Alberta page to read that it is a city. It is not, it is a hamlet. More information is available further down the page. --Yamla 04:16, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Uk-cad-ogg.ogg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Uk-cad-ogg.ogg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dethomas 05:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chinook Wind Article

Wikipedia is not a general repository for photos. My photo better illustrates the concept of a chinook "arch"; indeed, the other photos do not show this at all. So, even if I had not put mine in, I still believe yours are inappropriate and should be removed. This is not an "ego-trip"; rather, it is an attempt to make the article more relevant.

Also, your continued name calling of me is both juvenile and inaccurate. Please try to support the inclusion of your photos without resorting to it. In particular, I suggest you present arguments as to why you feel the older photos are a worthy addition to the article, and why mine is not. Elpoca 17:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Please take the discussion to the article talk page. This way we can build consensus as a community. Thanks. -- JamesTeterenko 22:00, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:North-am-cad-ogg.ogg

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:North-am-cad-ogg.ogg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 16:20, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Civil Edit summaries

Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing.--Crossmr 04:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

The same goes for sarcasm - ie your edit re references in the Calgary article - see homeless section below.Michael Dorosh 13:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] References

While I have no problem with the homeless stat being in the article, it was not my choice to put it in. I wasn't going to invest the effort to find the reference and link it because I knew that my comment would provoke the original contributer to do so anyway. It seems that it would have been common sense to do so in the first place. Furthermore, I am unaware of the source that the contributer actually used. It may have been a newspaper article, but it may also have been the original report. I'm not going to place a reference in an article when it wasn't actually the one that was used. In fact, I'm not even sure if that's technically legal. --Arch26 06:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. And when citing references, it is good form to use the <ref></ref> tags and give the name of the newspaper article, date, and author, where any of those are known. Personally, I think newspaper articles are best avoided, especially if the statistics they give don't themselves cite sources that can be verified by another source from an actual agency responsible for compiling figures.Michael Dorosh 13:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lethbridge Corn Maze

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Lethbridge Corn Maze, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Lethbridge Corn Maze. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Brianyoumans 06:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

thanks for correcting the numbering in iraq governorates. Abdalla A 20:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Swarming (crime)

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Swarming (crime), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)