Talk:California State Route 35
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Southern terminus
The southern terminus doesn't seem to be at Highway 17, I confirmed that first-hand today. It doesn't run along Summit Road at all, either. The problem is that no two maps seem to agree with where it actually begins. Can someone find a way to confirm where the southern teminus is?
Octoferret 05:48, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Re:Southern Terminus
I got the informationa bout the southern terminus and summit road both by driving it and referring to yahoo maps: Maps. Mapquest doens't show the 35 number, but yahoo! maps does, and by driving i['ve seen the 35 signs on the roads? - User:Atanamir
California Streets and Highway Code. Section 335. [1] Route 35 is from: (a) Route 17 at Summit Road to Route 92 via Skyline Boulevard. (b) Route 92 to Route 280 at Bunker Hill Drive. (c) Route 280 via Skyline Boulevard to Route 1 in San Francisco.
However, just because Highway 35 legally goes to Highway 17, it does not necessarily mean that it is signed from Highway 9. As stated near the top of List of California state highways:
- Many California highways have strange discontinuities in terms of the legal definition of their routes, which are not always accurately reflected in signage or maps.
Zzyzx11 22:16, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- [2] clearly shows it using Summit Road, like Google Maps shows. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 07:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Postmiles
The following can be seen in [3]:
- SCL/SCR 0.000-17.121: no equations
- SCL/SM 0.000-2.121: no equations
- SM 2.121-23.037: 22.330 mi
break at SR 92
- SM 21.720-22.760: no equations
break at I-280
- SM 22.761-31.537: 8.280 mi
- SF 0.000-3.164: no equations
--NE2 21:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Routing north of SR 92
[4] (1920) shows that the original plan was to continue along the ridge - though not the watershed boundary - to the current route near Pacifica. --NE2 00:04, 22 December 2007 (UTC)