Talk:California State Route 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics California State Highways
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.
WikiProject California This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] CalTrans omission?

In researching the postmiles for SR-28, the CalTrans bridge logs don't have an entry for Route 28. The route clearly exists as junctions for other routes in their sections of the logs, but SR-28 does NOT have an entry. The appropriate district for Route 28 would be District 3, I believe. Just a note if you were to report to CalTrans about this, and also why you see question marks in the junctions section of the routebox. --Geopgeop 13:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Guess I should have made that clear when I wrote the original version of this article... would have saved you some effort. I found the same as you did and made the route infobox just Google Earth. howcheng {chat} 06:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Hmm... just speculation, but if someone can verify this: are the postmiles for this route recorded by NevadaDOT instead? I know there was another route that went from Nevada into California and back and that one California didn't record either, but NDOT continued the postmiles through the discontinuities, please look that up as well... --Geopgeop 15:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)