Talk:California State Route 275

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article California State Route 275 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on December 27, 2007.
January 13, 2008 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics California State Highways
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments)
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
The map in this article is maintained by the Maps task force.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs of something in West Sacramento be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the following regions may able to help:
  • Sacramento County, California
  • Yolo County, California
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Comment

[1] shows the break in West Sacramento, which was apparently only between 12.4 and 13.0: [2] --NE2 06:06, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

This article may be a good candidate for GA. --Rschen7754 (T C) 20:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GA Review: On Hold

I have reviewed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria and have placed the article on hold until the following issues are addressed. As you address each issue, either strike through the statement/place a check mark next to the issue and state how you addressed it. If you disagree with a particular issue, state your rationale for doing so after the issue in question so a compromise can be reached. Also, there was no GA nomination banner on the top of this page, for future nominations, make sure one is added when nominating articles.

  1. In the "Route description" section, adjust the images as text should not be sandwiched between two images. Consider moving the one on the right down a little bit.
  2. "State maintenance ends just after the Jefferson Boulevard interchange, and the road - now maintained by the city of West Sacramento as Tower Bridge Gateway -" Convert the hyphens to & mdash; (to properly format it, remove the space in between the "&" and "m"; I have to do this to illustrate the formatting, otherwise it looks like this: —). Fix any other occurrences in the article. Also: "crosses the future Garden Street at grade." What is a grade? Please specify/add a link for readers who may not know what it is.
  3. "During that session, a new Route 275 was created" "Route 275" doesn't need to be bolded again. Do the same for "Tower Bridge Gateway" below.

Altogether, the article doesn't have too many problems. I have left the article on hold for seven days for the issues to be addressed. The above issues should be easy to fix and not take too long. If they are fixed in this time, I will pass the article. If not, the article may be failed and can be renominated at WP:GAN. If necessary to address the above issues, and progress is being made, an extension may be allowed. If you have any questions or when you are done, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

All done. --NE2 04:56, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] GA passed

Good job with addressing the above issues. I have passed this article according to the requirements of the GA criteria. Continue to improve the article, making sure that all new information is properly sourced and neutral.

Also, to anyone that is reading this review, please consider reviewing an article or two at WP:GAN to help with the very large backlog. Instructions can be found here. Each new reviewer that helps to review articles will help to reduce the time that articles wait to be reviewed. Keep up the good work, and I hope that you continue to bring articles up to Good Article status. If anyone disagrees with this review, an alternate opinion can be sought at Good article reassessment. If you have any further questions about this review, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)