Talk:California's 15th congressional district

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject California This article is part of WikiProject California, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
California's 15th congressional district is part of WikiProject U.S. Congress, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the United States Congress.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
The options are: "FA", "A", "GA", "B", "Start", "Stub", "List", "Disambiguation", "Template", or "Category."
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
The options are: "Top", "High", "Mid", and "Low."
??? This article has not yet been assigned a subject.
The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", and "Event."

[edit] Candidates' websites & 2008 campaign

Merge arrow
 For the sake of a broader audience, part or all of the discussion below has been transferred from the User namespace at User_talk:markles to this space below. Please continue the discussion here.

Markles-

I'm Peter Myers, the Green Party candidate for California's 15th Congressional District. I want to understand better why you have repeatedly cut information out of the entry for California's 15th Congressional District. First you deleted the names of challengers, and although I restored those, you proceeded to exclude most of the external links, including the incumbent and both challengers' websites. Why? My first reaction is to think that you favor the incumbent. What am I not understanding?

Thank you, Peter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Myersforcalifornia (talk • contribs) 01:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

  • I had made some wholesale changes to the article to make it conform to the style employed by other pages. In the process, I unintentionally dropped the 2008 election info. I have since restored it in a new place in the article.—Markles 02:36, 16 February 2008 (UTC)